Hilary Tait
- Education top 0.5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 5%
- Co-authors
- Noël EntwistleVelda McCuneJan H. F. MeyerHelen GodfreyJ. Mark PorterDiane GyiKate DayDai Hounsell
- Topics
- Evaluation of Teaching Practices (7 papers)Higher Education Research Studies (3 papers)Online and Blended Learning (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomHungaryGermany
In The Last Decade
Hilary Tait
13 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Education 1.1k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 362
- Social Psychology 184
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 130
- Management of Technology and Innovation 107
Countries citing papers authored by Hilary Tait
This map shows the geographic impact of Hilary Tait's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hilary Tait with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hilary Tait more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Hilary Tait
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hilary Tait. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hilary Tait. The network helps show where Hilary Tait may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hilary Tait
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hilary Tait. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hilary Tait based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hilary Tait. Hilary Tait is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 60 | |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 324 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | Feedback on courses and programmes of study: a handbook | 5 |
| 7 | 247 | |
| 8 | 70 | |
| 9 | Approaches to Studying and Preferences for Teaching in Higher Education: Implications for Student Ratings. | 20 |
| 10 | 84 | |
| 11 | Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environmentsbreakdown → | 481 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 17 |
About Hilary Tait
Hilary Tait is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 13 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation of Teaching Practices (7 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (3 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (1.1k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (362 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (107 citations). Hilary Tait has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hungary and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Noël Entwistle, Velda McCune, Jan H. F. Meyer, Helen Godfrey, J. Mark Porter, Diane Gyi, Kate Day and Dai Hounsell. Their work appears in journals such as Higher Education, British Journal of Educational Psychology and Applied Ergonomics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.