Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Comparison of Two Fluid-Management Strategies in Acute Lung Injury
20062.3k citationsHerbert WiedemannNew England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Pulmonary-Artery versus Central Venous Catheter to Guide Treatment of Acute Lung Injury
2006583 citationsArthur P. Wheeler, Gordon R. Bernard et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Aerosolized Surfactant in Adults with Sepsis-Induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
1996414 citationsKalpalatha K. Guntupalli, Herbert Wiedemann et al.New England Journal of Medicineprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Herbert Wiedemann
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Herbert Wiedemann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herbert Wiedemann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herbert Wiedemann more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Herbert Wiedemann
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herbert Wiedemann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herbert Wiedemann. The network helps show where Herbert Wiedemann may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Herbert Wiedemann
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Herbert Wiedemann.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Herbert Wiedemann based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Herbert Wiedemann. Herbert Wiedemann is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Wheeler, Arthur P., Gordon R. Bernard, Bruce Thompson, et al.. (2006). Pulmonary-Artery versus Central Venous Catheter to Guide Treatment of Acute Lung Injury. New England Journal of Medicine. 354(21). 2213–2224.583 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Wiedemann, Herbert. (2006). Comparison of Two Fluid-Management Strategies in Acute Lung Injury. New England Journal of Medicine. 354(24). 2564–2575.2298 indexed citations breakdown →
Günther, Rolf W., et al.. (1989). Informatik und Verantwortung, Arbeitskeis "Grenzen eines verantwortbaren Einsatzes von Informationstechnik" der Gesellschaft für Informatik.. Informatik-Spektrum. 12. 281–289.
16.
Adam, Dieter, H Helwig, H Knothe, et al.. (1988). RATIONALER EINSATZ ORALER ANTIBIOTIKA IN DER PRAXIS. 130. 883–890.7 indexed citations
17.
Wiedemann, Herbert. (1980). Gesellschaftsrecht : ein Lehrbuch des Unternehmens- und Verbandsrechts. C.H.Beck eBooks.2 indexed citations
18.
Wiedemann, Herbert. (1966). Das Arbeitsverhältnis als Austausch- und Gemeinschaftsverhältnis. C.F. Müller eBooks.
19.
Wiedemann, Herbert, et al.. (1966). Der Angestellte in der Industriegesellschaft. W. Kohlhammer eBooks.2 indexed citations
20.
Wiedemann, Herbert, et al.. (1963). Der Angestellte im automatisierten Büro : betriebssoziologische Untersuchung über die Auswirkungen elektronischer Datenverarbeitung auf die Angestellten und ihre Funktionen. W. Kohlhammer eBooks.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.