Henry Grattan Doyle
Henry Grattan Doyle
1 paper receiving 2 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 4 of 4
- General Health Professions 1
- Linguistics and Language 1
- Literature and Literary Theory 1
- Language and Linguistics 1
Countries citing papers authored by Henry Grattan Doyle
This map shows the geographic impact of Henry Grattan Doyle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henry Grattan Doyle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henry Grattan Doyle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Henry Grattan Doyle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henry Grattan Doyle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henry Grattan Doyle. The network helps show where Henry Grattan Doyle may publish in the future.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 |
About Henry Grattan Doyle
Henry Grattan Doyle is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 3 papers that have together received 2 indexed citations. The work is most often cited by research in Linguistics and Language (1 citation), Language and Linguistics (1 citation) and Literature and Literary Theory (1 citation). Henry Grattan Doyle has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Their work appears in journals such as Modern Language Journal, PMLA/Publications of the Modern Language Association of America and The Americas A Quarterly Review of Latin American History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.