Henrique Pinto

633 total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 419 citations indexed

About

Henrique Pinto is a scholar working on Information Systems, Communication and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Henrique Pinto has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 419 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Information Systems, 2 papers in Communication and 2 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Henrique Pinto's work include Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (2 papers), Expert finding and Q&A systems (2 papers) and Topic Modeling (2 papers). Henrique Pinto is often cited by papers focused on Information Retrieval and Search Behavior (2 papers), Expert finding and Q&A systems (2 papers) and Topic Modeling (2 papers). Henrique Pinto collaborates with scholars based in Brazil and Portugal. Henrique Pinto's co-authors include Jussara M. Almeida, Marcos André Gonçalves, Anabela Borges, Manuel Simões, Fabiano Belém, Flávio Figueiredo, David Fernandes, Edleno Silva de Moura, Luiz Gonzaga Vaz Coelho and Helenice Pankowski Breyer and has published in prestigious journals such as World Journal of Gastroenterology, Information Processing & Management and IEEE Internet Computing.

In The Last Decade

Henrique Pinto

7 papers receiving 406 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Using early view patterns to predict the popularity of youtube videos

2013 278 citations Henrique Pinto, Jussara M. Almeida et al. profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Henrique Pinto Brazil	6	186	118	111	103	90	7	419
Atif Nazir United States	8	122 0.7×	42 0.4×	71 0.6×	71 0.7×	135 1.5×	10	347
Jiexing Li China	10	22 0.1×	191 1.6×	122 1.1×	87 0.8×	138 1.5×	23	377
Giovanni Stilo Italy	11	116 0.6×	201 1.7×	99 0.9×	94 0.9×	37 0.4×	48	497
Anurag Singh India	12	224 1.2×	63 0.5×	15 0.1×	57 0.6×	51 0.6×	62	364
Keyuan Jiang United States	9	40 0.2×	98 0.8×	101 0.9×	56 0.5×	67 0.7×	50	294
Antônio A. de A. Rocha Brazil	9	27 0.1×	42 0.4×	161 1.5×	29 0.3×	181 2.0×	55	387
Phu Pham Vietnam	9	61 0.3×	175 1.5×	107 1.0×	40 0.4×	36 0.4×	27	335
HJ Sips Netherlands	7	27 0.1×	73 0.6×	72 0.6×	80 0.8×	359 4.0×	13	460
Xiaoxiao Ma China	10	29 0.2×	146 1.2×	97 0.9×	83 0.8×	81 0.9×	30	372
Keke Cai China	9	202 1.1×	293 2.5×	177 1.6×	79 0.8×	40 0.4×	27	528

Countries citing papers authored by Henrique Pinto

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Henrique Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Henrique Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Henrique Pinto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Henrique Pinto

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Henrique Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Henrique Pinto. The network helps show where Henrique Pinto may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Henrique Pinto

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Henrique Pinto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Henrique Pinto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Henrique Pinto. Henrique Pinto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Pinto, Henrique, Manuel Simões, & Anabela Borges. (2021). Prevalence and Impact of Biofilms on Bloodstream and Urinary Tract Infections: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Antibiotics. 10(7). 825–825. 34 indexed citations

2.

Breyer, Helenice Pankowski, et al.. (2016). Detection ofHelicobacter pyloriresistance to clarithromycin and fluoroquinolones in Brazil: A national survey. World Journal of Gastroenterology. 22(33). 7587–7587. 31 indexed citations

3.

Pinto, Henrique, Jussara M. Almeida, & Marcos André Gonçalves. (2013). Using early view patterns to predict the popularity of youtube videos. 365–374. 278 indexed citations breakdown →

4.

Figueiredo, Flávio, Henrique Pinto, Fabiano Belém, et al.. (2012). Assessing the quality of textual features in social media. Information Processing & Management. 49(1). 222–247. 45 indexed citations

5.

Almeida, Jussara M., Marcos André Gonçalves, Flávio Figueiredo, Henrique Pinto, & Fabiano Belém. (2010). On the Quality of Information for Web 2.0 Services. IEEE Internet Computing. 14(6). 47–55. 11 indexed citations

6.

Figueiredo, Flávio, Fabiano Belém, Henrique Pinto, et al.. (2009). Evidence of quality of textual features on the web 2.0. 909–918. 18 indexed citations

7.

Figueiredo, Flávio, Fabiano Belém, Henrique Pinto, et al.. (2009). Characterizing use and quality of textual attributes in Web 2.0 applications. 1–8. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact