Hélène Becq

1.3k citations
18 papers · 917 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Hélène Becq

17 papers receiving 896 citations

Peers

Hélène Becq
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Developmental Neuroscience 159
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 654
  • Neurology 90
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 207
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 113
Replace E Sanabria with:
E Sanabria Brazil
Chengwen Zhou United States
Amina Rafiki France
Xiao-Bo Liu United States
Guido C. Faas United States
Peter A. Paskevich United States
Ailing A. Lie Germany
Oana Chever France
Yves Larmet France
Pavel Uvarov Finland
Hélène Becq relative to E Sanabria Brazil E Sanabria's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
E Sanabria · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hélène Becq

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hélène Becq's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hélène Becq with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hélène Becq more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hélène Becq

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hélène Becq. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hélène Becq. The network helps show where Hélène Becq may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Hélène Becq, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hélène Becq Line = papers co-authored together Hélène Becq links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2002219
2 2002120
3 200472
4 202070
5 201168
6 200963
7 201745
8 201636
9 201236
10 200634
11 200432
12 201029
13 201227
14 201627
15 199917
16 202213
17 20179
18 20250

About Hélène Becq

Hélène Becq is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental Neuroscience, having authored 18 papers that have together received 917 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (13 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (7 papers), Epilepsy research and treatment (5 papers), Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (3 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (2 papers), Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (2 papers) and Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental Neuroscience (159 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (654 citations), Neurology (90 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (207 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (113 citations). Hélène Becq has collaborated with scholars based in France, Italy and United States. Frequent co-authors include Laurent Aniksztejn, Yehezkel Ben‐Ari, Alfonso Represa, Michaël Demarque, Ilgam Khalilov, Valérie Crépel, Rosa Cossart, J F Hirsch, Nathalie Villeneuve and Jérôme Epsztein. Their work appears in journals such as Epilepsia, Journal of Neuroscience, The Journal of Physiology, Neuron and Cerebral Cortex.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact