Heleen Schuring‐Blom

529 total citations
8 papers, 178 citations indexed

About

Heleen Schuring‐Blom is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Heleen Schuring‐Blom has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 178 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 5 papers in Genetics and 2 papers in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Heleen Schuring‐Blom's work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (7 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (5 papers) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (2 papers). Heleen Schuring‐Blom is often cited by papers focused on Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (7 papers), Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities (5 papers) and Genomics and Rare Diseases (2 papers). Heleen Schuring‐Blom collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Italy and Belgium. Heleen Schuring‐Blom's co-authors include Katrina Rack, Siân Morgan, Nicole de Leeuw, Daniela Giardino, Ros Hastings, Kathy Mann, N. J. Leschot, Myra C.B. van Zwieten, Martin Elferink and Dick L. Willems and has published in prestigious journals such as European Journal of Human Genetics, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth and European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.

In The Last Decade

Heleen Schuring‐Blom

8 papers receiving 172 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Heleen Schuring‐Blom Netherlands 7 117 113 42 25 16 8 178
Zhenjun Yang China 6 146 1.2× 139 1.2× 59 1.4× 19 0.8× 21 1.3× 6 221
Paulette Barahona Australia 6 88 0.8× 74 0.7× 36 0.9× 12 0.5× 8 0.5× 14 148
C. Mediano Spain 8 163 1.4× 159 1.4× 76 1.8× 10 0.4× 32 2.0× 12 244
Sharyn Stock‐Myer Australia 3 77 0.7× 109 1.0× 43 1.0× 12 0.5× 9 0.6× 5 143
Fe Amalia García‐Santiago Spain 5 161 1.4× 115 1.0× 82 2.0× 9 0.4× 14 0.9× 12 197
Eva Pompilii Italy 7 145 1.2× 245 2.2× 50 1.2× 21 0.8× 13 0.8× 13 298
Dominique Le Tessier France 8 119 1.0× 82 0.7× 66 1.6× 8 0.3× 37 2.3× 15 167
Francisco Álvarez‐Nava Venezuela 9 181 1.5× 39 0.3× 145 3.5× 16 0.6× 42 2.6× 25 254
Rubén Martín‐Arenas Spain 6 89 0.8× 57 0.5× 66 1.6× 9 0.4× 27 1.7× 12 162
Andrea Petersen United States 5 81 0.7× 123 1.1× 51 1.2× 14 0.6× 2 0.1× 8 195

Countries citing papers authored by Heleen Schuring‐Blom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heleen Schuring‐Blom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heleen Schuring‐Blom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heleen Schuring‐Blom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heleen Schuring‐Blom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heleen Schuring‐Blom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heleen Schuring‐Blom. The network helps show where Heleen Schuring‐Blom may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heleen Schuring‐Blom

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heleen Schuring‐Blom. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heleen Schuring‐Blom based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Heleen Schuring‐Blom. Heleen Schuring‐Blom is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Hochstenbach, Ron, et al.. (2018). Discordant NIPT result in a viable trisomy‐21 pregnancy due to prolonged contribution to cf DNA by a demised trisomy‐14 cotwin. Clinical Case Reports. 6(5). 788–791. 8 indexed citations
2.
Hochstenbach, Ron, Ellen van Binsbergen, Heleen Schuring‐Blom, Arjan Buijs, & Hans Kristian Ploos van Amstel. (2018). A survey of undetected, clinically relevant chromosome abnormalities when replacing postnatal karyotyping by Whole Genome Sequencing. European Journal of Medical Genetics. 62(9). 103543–103543. 13 indexed citations
3.
Leeuw, Nicole de, Kathy Mann, Heleen Schuring‐Blom, et al.. (2018). European guidelines for constitutional cytogenomic analysis. European Journal of Human Genetics. 27(1). 1–16. 92 indexed citations
4.
Schuring‐Blom, Heleen, Klaske D. Lichtenbelt, Karin P. M. van Galen, et al.. (2016). Maternal vitamin B12 deficiency and abnormal cell-free DNA results in pregnancy. Prenatal Diagnosis. 36(8). 790–793. 12 indexed citations
5.
Hochstenbach, Ron, Peter G. J. Nikkels, Martin Elferink, et al.. (2015). Cell‐free fetal DNA in the maternal circulation originates from the cytotrophoblast: proof from an unique case. Clinical Case Reports. 3(6). 489–491. 12 indexed citations
6.
Birnie, Erwin, Hajo I. J. Wildschut, Heleen Schuring‐Blom, et al.. (2008). Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification versus karyotyping in prenatal diagnosis: the M.A.K.E. study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 8(1). 18–18. 19 indexed citations
7.
Goddijn, Mariëtte, Heleen Schuring‐Blom, B. Redeker, et al.. (2005). Detection of Chromosome Abnormalities by Quantitative Fluorescent PCR in Ectopic Pregnancies. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation. 60(3). 139–144. 3 indexed citations
8.
Zwieten, Myra C.B. van, et al.. (2005). How unexpected are unexpected findings in prenatal cytogenetic diagnosis? A literature review. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 120(1). 15–21. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026