Héber Cinco-Ley
About
In The Last Decade
Héber Cinco-Ley
40 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Countries citing papers authored by Héber Cinco-Ley
This map shows the geographic impact of Héber Cinco-Ley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Héber Cinco-Ley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Héber Cinco-Ley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Héber Cinco-Ley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Héber Cinco-Ley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Héber Cinco-Ley. The network helps show where Héber Cinco-Ley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Héber Cinco-Ley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Héber Cinco-Ley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Héber Cinco-Ley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Héber Cinco-Ley. Héber Cinco-Ley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.