Heather Tick
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 5%
- Pharmacology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Arya NielsenKenneth R. PelletierPeter M. WayneRobert Alan BonakdarEmily F. RatnerRonald M. GlickJeffery A. DusekLisa Taylor‐Swanson
- Topics
- Muscle Physiology and Disorders (5 papers)Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (5 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers)
- Journals
- American Journal of Physical Medicine & RehabilitationCanadian Journal of Physiology and PharmacologyPain Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Heather Tick
14 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Complementary and alternative medicine 117
- Pharmacology 116
- Cognitive Neuroscience 91
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 75
- Psychiatry and Mental health 61
Countries citing papers authored by Heather Tick
This map shows the geographic impact of Heather Tick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather Tick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather Tick more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Heather Tick
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather Tick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather Tick. The network helps show where Heather Tick may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heather Tick
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heather Tick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heather Tick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Heather Tick. Heather Tick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 23 | |
| 5 | 228 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 10 |
About Heather Tick
Heather Tick is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Anatomy and Complementary and Manual Therapy, having authored 14 papers that have together received 378 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle Physiology and Disorders (5 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (5 papers) and Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (117 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (75 citations) and Pharmacology (116 citations). Heather Tick has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Arya Nielsen, Kenneth R. Pelletier, Peter M. Wayne, Robert Alan Bonakdar, Emily F. Ratner, Ronald M. Glick, Jeffery A. Dusek, Lisa Taylor‐Swanson, J. Ouyang and Howard J. Green. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology and Pain Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.