Heather L. Smith

409 total citations
18 papers, 223 citations indexed

About

Heather L. Smith is a scholar working on Anthropology, Paleontology and Geometry and Topology. According to data from OpenAlex, Heather L. Smith has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 223 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Anthropology, 12 papers in Paleontology and 6 papers in Geometry and Topology. Recurrent topics in Heather L. Smith's work include Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (16 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (11 papers) and Morphological variations and asymmetry (6 papers). Heather L. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology (16 papers), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (11 papers) and Morphological variations and asymmetry (6 papers). Heather L. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, Russia and Canada. Heather L. Smith's co-authors include Ted Goebel, Thomas J. DeWitt, David Rhode, Kelly E. Graf, Thomas A. Jennings, Ashley M. Smallwood, Michael R. Waters, Loren G. Davis, Geoffrey M. Smith and Dennis L. Jenkins and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Archaeological Science.

In The Last Decade

Heather L. Smith

17 papers receiving 203 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Heather L. Smith United States 8 175 163 51 51 27 18 223
J. David Kilby United States 11 251 1.4× 241 1.5× 43 0.8× 66 1.3× 12 0.4× 20 315
Tuija Rankama Finland 8 225 1.3× 229 1.4× 67 1.3× 103 2.0× 49 1.8× 16 301
Delphine Kuntz France 10 221 1.3× 161 1.0× 57 1.1× 83 1.6× 9 0.3× 16 249
Karen Borrazzo Argentina 12 335 1.9× 292 1.8× 66 1.3× 163 3.2× 20 0.7× 38 400
Olivier Bignon France 10 276 1.6× 230 1.4× 58 1.1× 128 2.5× 12 0.4× 21 354
Ashley Lemke United States 9 175 1.0× 200 1.2× 45 0.9× 102 2.0× 28 1.0× 27 272
Bonnie L. Pitblado United States 10 163 0.9× 196 1.2× 76 1.5× 98 1.9× 11 0.4× 25 290
Sandra Sázelová Czechia 9 182 1.0× 148 0.9× 52 1.0× 106 2.1× 10 0.4× 31 232
Mark F. Seeman United States 12 223 1.3× 244 1.5× 19 0.4× 96 1.9× 15 0.6× 23 310
Ashley M. Smallwood United States 13 482 2.8× 457 2.8× 96 1.9× 168 3.3× 12 0.4× 31 551

Countries citing papers authored by Heather L. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Heather L. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Heather L. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Heather L. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Heather L. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Heather L. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Heather L. Smith. The network helps show where Heather L. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Heather L. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Heather L. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Heather L. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Heather L. Smith. Heather L. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Smith, Heather L., Thomas A. Jennings, & Ashley M. Smallwood. (2024). The third dimension of stone points: 2D vs. 3D geometric morphometric shape analysis. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences. 16(10). 1 indexed citations
2.
Wang, Jianye, et al.. (2024). ASL champ!: a virtual reality game with deep-learning driven sign recognition. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4. 100059–100059. 5 indexed citations
3.
Buchanan, Briggs, Marcus J. Hamilton, Heather L. Smith, et al.. (2023). Comparing Clovis and Folsom fluting via scaling analysis. Archaeometry. 66(2). 266–281. 4 indexed citations
4.
Smith, Heather L.. (2023). Clovis Lifeways Set in Stone: The Contribution of Fluted-Point Morphological Variation. PaleoAmerica. 9(4). 269–288. 1 indexed citations
5.
Jennings, Thomas A., et al.. (2023). Early Archaic landscape use, cultural transmission, and aggregation in the lower Ohio River valley. Southeastern Archaeology. 42(1). 12–30. 1 indexed citations
6.
Smallwood, Ashley M., et al.. (2022). Using 3D Models to Understand the Changing Role of Fluting in Paleoindian Point Technology from Clovis to Dalton. American Antiquity. 87(3). 544–566. 9 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Heather L. & Amy Reid. (2022). Evaluating the Fluted Points from Spring Lake, Texas: A Geometric Morphometric Shape Analysis of Clovis Affinity. PaleoAmerica. 8(4). 340–351. 1 indexed citations
8.
Smith, Heather L., Thomas A. Jennings, & Ashley M. Smallwood. (2021). Do early Paleoindian point blades carry culturally significant shape information? Modules versus complete points using geometric morphometrics. Journal of Archaeological Science Reports. 40. 103245–103245. 10 indexed citations
9.
Smith, Heather L., et al.. (2019). Variation in Fluted-point Technology: Investigations across Space and Time. PaleoAmerica. 5(2). 105–108. 5 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Geoffrey M., et al.. (2019). The Western Stemmed Tradition: Problems and Prospects in Paleoindian Archaeology in the Intermountain West. PaleoAmerica. 6(1). 23–42. 36 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Heather L., Susan Kuzminsky, & Anna Linderholm. (2019). Discerning Dispersals along the Pacific and Interior Corridors: Contributions of Geometric Morphometrics to the Peopling of the Americas. PaleoAmerica. 6(1). 109–130. 7 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Heather L. & Ted Goebel. (2018). Origins and spread of fluted-point technology in the Canadian Ice-Free Corridor and eastern Beringia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 115(16). 4116–4121. 50 indexed citations
13.
Smith, Heather L., et al.. (2016). Archaeological Evidence for the Construction of Features at the Kovrizhka Site, Siberia, during the Pleistocene-Holocene Transition. PaleoAmerica. 2(4). 343–361. 1 indexed citations
14.
Smith, Heather L. & Thomas J. DeWitt. (2016). The northern fluted point complex: technological and morphological evidence of adaptation and risk in the late Pleistocene-early Holocene Arctic. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences. 9(8). 1799–1823. 17 indexed citations
15.
Graf, Kelly E., et al.. (2015). Dry Creek Revisited: New Excavations, Radiocarbon Dates, and Site Formation Inform on the Peopling of Eastern Beringia. American Antiquity. 80(4). 671–694. 26 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Heather L.. (2015). Paleoindian Technology in Beringia— A Technological and Morphological Analysis of the Northern Fluted-Point Complex. OakTrust (Texas A&M University Libraries).
17.
Goebel, Ted, Heather L. Smith, Michael R. Waters, et al.. (2013). Serpentine Hot Springs, Alaska: results of excavations and implications for the age and significance of northern fluted points. Journal of Archaeological Science. 40(12). 4222–4233. 35 indexed citations
18.
Banks, Iain, et al.. (1996). Excavation at Lintshie Gutter Unenclosed Platform Settlement, Crawford, Lanarkshire, 1991. Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland. 125. 369–427. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026