Haruka Higuma
- Behavioral Neuroscience top 2%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Biological Psychiatry top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jotaro AkiyoshiTaiga NinomiyaMasayuki KanehisaYoshinobu IshitobiYoshihiro TanakaYoshihiro MaruyamaAyako InoueHiroaki Hanada
- Topics
- Stress Responses and Cortisol (8 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (7 papers)Tryptophan and brain disorders (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- Japan
In The Last Decade
Haruka Higuma
22 papers receiving 487 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Behavioral Neuroscience 187
- Clinical Psychology 135
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 89
- Cognitive Neuroscience 83
- Biological Psychiatry 78
Countries citing papers authored by Haruka Higuma
This map shows the geographic impact of Haruka Higuma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Haruka Higuma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Haruka Higuma more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Haruka Higuma
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Haruka Higuma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Haruka Higuma. The network helps show where Haruka Higuma may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Haruka Higuma
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Haruka Higuma. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Haruka Higuma based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Haruka Higuma. Haruka Higuma is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 21 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 21 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 19 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | The thyrotropin-releasing hormone test may predict recurrence of clinical depression within ten years after discharge. | 9 |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 41 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 87 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 55 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 38 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Haruka Higuma
Haruka Higuma is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Behavioral Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 497 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress Responses and Cortisol (8 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (7 papers) and Tryptophan and brain disorders (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (187 citations), Biological Psychiatry (78 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (89 citations). Haruka Higuma has collaborated with scholars based in Japan. Frequent co-authors include Jotaro Akiyoshi, Taiga Ninomiya, Masayuki Kanehisa, Yoshinobu Ishitobi, Yoshihiro Tanaka, Yoshihiro Maruyama, Ayako Inoue, Hiroaki Hanada, Jusen Tsuru and Shizuko Okamoto. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Affective Disorders and Psychiatry Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.