This map shows the geographic impact of Hans Limburg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hans Limburg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hans Limburg more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hans Limburg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hans Limburg. The network helps show where Hans Limburg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hans Limburg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hans Limburg.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hans Limburg based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Hans Limburg. Hans Limburg is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kempen, John H., Rupert Bourne, Tien Yin Wong, et al.. (2017). Estimated Prevalence of Visual Impairment in Sub-Saharan Africa (2015). Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(8). 2197–2197.
2.
Bourne, Rupert, Seth Flaxman, Tasanee Braithwaite, et al.. (2017). Global Prevalence of Blindness and Distance and Near Vision Impairment: Magnitude, Temporal Trends, and Projections. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(8). 840–840.3 indexed citations
Silva, Juan Carlos, Óscar J. Mújica, Enrique Vega, et al.. (2015). Una evaluación comparativa de la ceguera y la deficiencia visual evitables en siete países latinoamericanos: prevalencia, cobertura y desigualdades. 37(1). 13–20.1 indexed citations
6.
Limburg, Hans, et al.. (2015). Functional low vision in adults from Latin America: findings from population-based surveys in 15 countries.. PubMed. 37(6). 371–8.12 indexed citations
7.
Silva, Juan Carlos, Óscar J. Mújica, Enrique Vega, et al.. (2015). A comparative assessment of avoidable blindness and visual impairment in seven Latin American countries: prevalence, coverage, and inequality.. PubMed. 37(1). 13–20.23 indexed citations
8.
Zepeda‐Romero, Luz Consuelo, et al.. (2015). [National survey of blindness and avoidable visual impairment in Argentina, 2013].. PubMed. 37(1). 7–12.10 indexed citations
9.
Broce, Alberto B., et al.. (2014). Encuesta de ceguera y deficiencia visual evitable en Panamá. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.1 indexed citations
10.
Lansingh, Van Charles, et al.. (2014). [National survey on the prevalence and causes of blindness in Peru].. PubMed. 36(5). 283–9.16 indexed citations
11.
Furtado, João M., et al.. (2014). Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness in Uruguay: results of a nationwide survey.. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 36(4). 219–24.13 indexed citations
12.
Broce, Alberto B., et al.. (2014). [Survey on avoidable blindness and visual impairment in Panama].. PubMed. 36(6). 355–60.8 indexed citations
13.
Flores, Eduardo, et al.. (2014). [National survey of blindness and avoidable visual impairment in Honduras].. PubMed. 36(5). 300–5.10 indexed citations
Lewallen, Susan, Claudia Perez-Straziota, Van Charles Lansingh, Hans Limburg, & Juan Carlos Silva. (2012). Variation in Cataract Surgery Needs in Latin America. Archives of Ophthalmology. 130(12). 1575–1575.19 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.