Hannah Specht

497 total citations
9 papers, 386 citations indexed

About

Hannah Specht is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecological Modeling and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Hannah Specht has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 386 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Ecology, 3 papers in Ecological Modeling and 2 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Hannah Specht's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (3 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers). Hannah Specht is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (4 papers), Avian ecology and behavior (3 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers). Hannah Specht collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Hannah Specht's co-authors include Eva Lewandowski, Todd W. Arnold, Jürgen Schlegel, Guntram Suske, Marcus Schuermann, Anja Wimmel, Markus W. Groß, Mitch D. Weegman, Seth Stapleton and Fabiola Iannarilli and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Oncogene and Conservation Biology.

In The Last Decade

Hannah Specht

9 papers receiving 372 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Hannah Specht United States	7	162	155	82	66	65	9	386
Paras B. Singh China	15	189 1.2×	202 1.3×	181 2.2×	88 1.3×	54 0.8×	34	744
Hania Lada Australia	14	112 0.7×	221 1.4×	70 0.9×	111 1.7×	59 0.9×	25	442
Baptiste Bedessem France	9	120 0.7×	79 0.5×	44 0.5×	33 0.5×	10 0.2×	26	370
Carlos Henrique Madeiros Castelletti Brazil	7	66 0.4×	71 0.5×	120 1.5×	109 1.7×	30 0.5×	11	431
Christopher A. Jordan United States	10	46 0.3×	100 0.6×	50 0.6×	29 0.4×	23 0.4×	21	326
Ella Bowles Canada	10	42 0.3×	156 1.0×	127 1.5×	94 1.4×	85 1.3×	22	455
Jason M. Jones United States	12	55 0.3×	60 0.4×	62 0.8×	33 0.5×	136 2.1×	40	466
Xudong Yang China	12	67 0.4×	40 0.3×	96 1.2×	79 1.2×	62 1.0×	53	367
Karen Higginbottom Australia	13	20 0.1×	186 1.2×	162 2.0×	39 0.6×	98 1.5×	35	569
Kyle A. O’Connell United States	15	109 0.7×	73 0.5×	115 1.4×	35 0.5×	10 0.2×	32	388

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Specht

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Specht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Specht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Specht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Specht

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Specht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Specht. The network helps show where Hannah Specht may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hannah Specht

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hannah Specht. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hannah Specht based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hannah Specht. Hannah Specht is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Specht, Hannah, et al.. (2024). Ten lessons for rare wildlife species conservation when coming from a common species background. Conservation Science and Practice. 6(8). 1 indexed citations

2.

Specht, Hannah, et al.. (2022). A framework for evaluating the implications of assumptions in broad conservation strategies. Conservation Science and Practice. 4(8). 5 indexed citations

3.

Specht, Hannah, et al.. (2020). Habitat selection and nest survival in two Great Plains shorebirds. Avian Conservation and Ecology. 15(1). 7 indexed citations

4.

Specht, Hannah & Eva Lewandowski. (2018). Biased Assumptions and Oversimplifications in Evaluations of Citizen Science Data Quality. Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America. 99(2). 251–256. 23 indexed citations

5.

Specht, Hannah & Todd W. Arnold. (2018). Banding age ratios reveal prairie waterfowl fecundity is affected by climate, density dependence and predator–prey dynamics. Journal of Applied Ecology. 55(6). 2854–2864. 28 indexed citations

6.

Specht, Hannah, Fabiola Iannarilli, Seth Stapleton, et al.. (2017). Occupancy surveys with conditional replicates: An alternative sampling design for rare species. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 8(12). 1725–1734. 43 indexed citations

7.

Arnold, Todd W., et al.. (2016). Annual survival rates of migratory shore and upland game birds. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 40(3). 470–476. 7 indexed citations

8.

Lewandowski, Eva & Hannah Specht. (2015). Influence of volunteer and project characteristics on data quality of biological surveys. Conservation Biology. 29(3). 713–723. 162 indexed citations

9.

Specht, Hannah, Anja Wimmel, Markus W. Groß, et al.. (2002). In vitro chemo- and radio-resistance in small cell lung cancer correlates with cell adhesion and constitutive activation of AKT and MAP kinase pathways. Oncogene. 21(57). 8683–8695. 110 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact