Hannah Chalmers

3.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
76 papers, 2.8k citations indexed

About

Hannah Chalmers is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Environmental Engineering and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Hannah Chalmers has authored 76 papers receiving a total of 2.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Mechanical Engineering, 23 papers in Environmental Engineering and 17 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in Hannah Chalmers's work include Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (46 papers), CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (20 papers) and Climate Change Policy and Economics (16 papers). Hannah Chalmers is often cited by papers focused on Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies (46 papers), CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions (20 papers) and Climate Change Policy and Economics (16 papers). Hannah Chalmers collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Hannah Chalmers's co-authors include Jon Gibbins, Mathieu Lucquiaud, Nils Markusson, Matt Leach, R. Stuart Haszeldine, Juan Riaza, Vivian Scott, Stuart Gilfillan, Jia Li and Xi Liang and has published in prestigious journals such as Energy Policy, Nature Climate Change and Energy.

In The Last Decade

Hannah Chalmers

75 papers receiving 2.6k citations

Hit Papers

Carbon capture and storage 2008 2026 2014 2020 2008 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hannah Chalmers United Kingdom 24 1.6k 844 690 404 393 76 2.8k
John Davison United Kingdom 18 1.7k 1.1× 824 1.0× 723 1.0× 312 0.8× 362 0.9× 33 2.6k
Jon Gibbins United Kingdom 33 2.2k 1.4× 1.8k 2.2× 673 1.0× 460 1.1× 440 1.1× 137 4.2k
Chris Hendriks Netherlands 22 1.3k 0.8× 561 0.7× 1.1k 1.6× 193 0.5× 339 0.9× 48 3.2k
Sean McCoy United States 21 1.1k 0.7× 311 0.4× 771 1.1× 309 0.8× 483 1.2× 58 2.1k
Simon Roussanaly Norway 35 2.2k 1.4× 821 1.0× 1.0k 1.5× 392 1.0× 353 0.9× 92 3.3k
Jamie Speirs United Kingdom 23 782 0.5× 356 0.4× 846 1.2× 707 1.8× 754 1.9× 31 3.3k
Peter Psarras United States 16 1.0k 0.6× 314 0.4× 609 0.9× 177 0.4× 329 0.8× 37 1.9k
Gökhan Aydın Türkiye 32 755 0.5× 462 0.5× 332 0.5× 388 1.0× 290 0.7× 53 2.7k
Evangelos Tzimas Netherlands 31 1.8k 1.1× 690 0.8× 697 1.0× 835 2.1× 864 2.2× 65 3.9k
Rahul Anantharaman Norway 32 2.2k 1.4× 1.1k 1.3× 560 0.8× 336 0.8× 311 0.8× 90 3.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Chalmers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Chalmers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Chalmers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Chalmers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Chalmers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Chalmers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Chalmers. The network helps show where Hannah Chalmers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hannah Chalmers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hannah Chalmers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hannah Chalmers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hannah Chalmers. Hannah Chalmers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Chalmers, Hannah, et al.. (2023). Investigating the prospects for Carbon Capture and Storage technology in India. ERA. 1 indexed citations
2.
González-Díaz, Abigail, et al.. (2019). Operating flexibility of natural gas combined cycle power plant integrated with post-combustion capture. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 88. 92–108. 13 indexed citations
3.
Magalhães, Duarte, et al.. (2017). Combustion of Turkish lignites and olive residue: Experiments and kinetic modelling. Fuel. 203. 868–876. 46 indexed citations
4.
Chalmers, Hannah, et al.. (2017). Developing CCS in the UK and Beyond: Insights from the UK CCS Research Centre. Energy Procedia. 114. 5521–5528. 1 indexed citations
5.
Race, Julia, et al.. (2017). On the potential for interim storage in dense phase CO 2 pipelines. International journal of greenhouse gas control. 66. 276–287. 9 indexed citations
6.
Gibbins, Jon, et al.. (2015). Operational Flexibility of Future Generation Portfolios Using High Spatial- and Temporal-Resolution Wind Data. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy. 7(2). 697–707. 23 indexed citations
7.
Lucquiaud, Mathieu, et al.. (2013). Incorporating Future Technological Improvements in Existing CO2 Capture Plants. 1 indexed citations
8.
Markusson, Nils, Florian Kern, Jim Watson, et al.. (2012). A socio-technical framework for assessing the viability of carbon capture and storage technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 79(5). 903–918. 83 indexed citations
9.
Scott, Vivian, Stuart Gilfillan, Nils Markusson, Hannah Chalmers, & R. Stuart Haszeldine. (2012). Last chance for carbon capture and storage. Nature Climate Change. 3(2). 105–111. 297 indexed citations
10.
Gibbins, Jon, Hannah Chalmers, Mathieu Lucquiaud, et al.. (2011). Techno-economic assessment of CO2 capture retrofit to existing power plants. Energy Procedia. 4. 1835–1842. 14 indexed citations
11.
Gibbins, Jon, Hannah Chalmers, Mathieu Lucquiaud, et al.. (2011). Retrofitting CO2 Capture to Existing Power Plants. 24 indexed citations
12.
Workman, Mark, Niall R. McGlashan, Hannah Chalmers, & Nilay Shah. (2011). An assessment of options for CO2 removal from the atmosphere. Energy Procedia. 4. 2877–2884. 11 indexed citations
13.
Gibbins, Jon, et al.. (2009). Capture readiness:CCGT owners needn’t feel left out. 29(20). 17–20. 1 indexed citations
14.
Chalmers, Hannah & Jon Gibbins. (2009). Carbon capture and storage: The ten year challenge. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science. 224(3). 505–518. 17 indexed citations
15.
Chalmers, Hannah, Mathieu Lucquiaud, Jon Gibbins, & Matt Leach. (2009). Flexible Operation of Coal Fired Power Plants with Postcombustion Capture of Carbon Dioxide. Journal of Environmental Engineering. 135(6). 449–458. 115 indexed citations
16.
Lucquiaud, Mathieu, Hannah Chalmers, & Jon Gibbins. (2009). Capture-ready supercritical coal-fired power plants and flexible post-combustion CO2 capture. Energy Procedia. 1(1). 1411–1418. 43 indexed citations
17.
Lucquiaud, Mathieu, Hannah Chalmers, & Jon Gibbins. (2009). Steam turbines for operating and future-proof upgrading flexibility. 1 indexed citations
18.
Gibbins, Jon & Hannah Chalmers. (2008). Beyond the Competition - incentivising carbon capture and storage at UK power plants, why and how. 12–16. 3 indexed citations
19.
Chalmers, Hannah, Jon Gibbins, & Matt Leach. (2007). Site specific considerations for investments in new coal-fired power plants with CO2 capture. View. 1 indexed citations
20.
Gibbins, Jon & Hannah Chalmers. (2007). Preparing for global rollout: A ‘developed country first’ demonstration programme for rapid CCS deployment. Energy Policy. 36(2). 501–507. 63 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026