Hannah Anderson

477 total citations
9 papers, 340 citations indexed

About

Hannah Anderson is a scholar working on Ecology, Genetics and Nature and Landscape Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Hannah Anderson has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 340 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Ecology, 4 papers in Genetics and 3 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation. Recurrent topics in Hannah Anderson's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (7 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (3 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers). Hannah Anderson is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (7 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (3 papers) and Rangeland and Wildlife Management (3 papers). Hannah Anderson collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Sweden. Hannah Anderson's co-authors include Patricia A. Fleming, G.E.St.J. Hardy, Leonie E. Valentine, Kit Prendergast, David R. Cléments, Thomas N. Kaye, Bart R. Johnson, Scott D. Bridgham, Brendan M. Rogers and Dominique Bachelet and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Mammal Review and Wildlife Research.

In The Last Decade

Hannah Anderson

9 papers receiving 330 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hannah Anderson Australia 6 238 137 80 58 55 9 340
Nacho Villar Brazil 12 243 1.0× 183 1.3× 77 1.0× 68 1.2× 87 1.6× 20 359
Shaenandhoa García-Rangel United Kingdom 7 160 0.7× 80 0.6× 70 0.9× 89 1.5× 62 1.1× 8 287
Alex I. James Australia 11 364 1.5× 252 1.8× 88 1.1× 69 1.2× 80 1.5× 14 476
Giovany Guevara Colombia 9 181 0.8× 105 0.8× 64 0.8× 65 1.1× 138 2.5× 44 380
Juan Gallego‐Zamorano Netherlands 10 232 1.0× 127 0.9× 112 1.4× 137 2.4× 124 2.3× 15 450
A. Mitchell‐Jones United States 10 257 1.1× 135 1.0× 56 0.7× 130 2.2× 97 1.8× 19 383
María Luisa S. P. Jorge United States 11 375 1.6× 162 1.2× 77 1.0× 95 1.6× 94 1.7× 23 482
Emilian P. Mayemba Netherlands 5 221 0.9× 136 1.0× 106 1.3× 26 0.4× 41 0.7× 8 340
H. Eden W. Cottee‐Jones United Kingdom 9 206 0.9× 236 1.7× 68 0.8× 112 1.9× 121 2.2× 13 397
Ariel A. Farías Chile 12 224 0.9× 89 0.6× 112 1.4× 65 1.1× 54 1.0× 23 339

Countries citing papers authored by Hannah Anderson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hannah Anderson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hannah Anderson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hannah Anderson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hannah Anderson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hannah Anderson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hannah Anderson. The network helps show where Hannah Anderson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hannah Anderson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hannah Anderson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hannah Anderson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hannah Anderson. Hannah Anderson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Palmer, Russell, et al.. (2021). Does aerial baiting for controlling feral cats in a heterogeneous landscape confer benefits to a threatened native meso-predator?. PLoS ONE. 16(5). e0251304–e0251304. 13 indexed citations
2.
Anderson, Hannah, et al.. (2021). Feral cat (Felis catus) predation confirmed for Rothschild’s rock-wallaby (Petrogale rothschildi) in the Pilbara. Australian Mammalogy. 44(1). 169–172. 2 indexed citations
3.
Slater, Gary, et al.. (2020). Range-Wide Patterns of Natal and Breeding Dispersal in the Streaked Horned Lark. Northwest Science. 94(1). 31–31. 1 indexed citations
4.
Cowan, Mitchell A., et al.. (2020). Aerial baiting for feral cats is unlikely to affect survivorship of northern quolls in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. Wildlife Research. 47(8). 589–598. 12 indexed citations
5.
Anderson, Hannah, Leonie E. Valentine, G.E.St.J. Hardy, & Patricia A. Fleming. (2019). Relationship between the common brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula) and tuart (Eucalyptus gomphocephala) tree decline in Western Australia. Australian Mammalogy. 42(1). 67–76. 2 indexed citations
6.
Valentine, Leonie E., Hannah Anderson, G.E.St.J. Hardy, & Patricia A. Fleming. (2013). Foraging activity by the southern brown bandicoot (Isoodon obesulus) as a mechanism for soil turnover. Australian Journal of Zoology. 60(6). 419–423. 37 indexed citations
7.
Fleming, Patricia A., et al.. (2013). Is the loss of Australian digging mammals contributing to a deterioration in ecosystem function?. Mammal Review. 44(2). 94–108. 210 indexed citations
8.
Anderson, Hannah, et al.. (2011). Management Strategies for Invasive Plants in Pacific Northwest Prairies, Savannas, and Oak Woodlands. Northwest Science. 85(2). 329–351. 35 indexed citations
9.
Bachelet, Dominique, et al.. (2011). Climate Change Impacts on Western Pacific Northwest Prairies and Savannas. Northwest Science. 85(2). 411–429. 28 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026