Halit Nahit Şendur
About
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Halit Nahit Şendur
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Halit Nahit Şendur. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Halit Nahit Şendur based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Halit Nahit Şendur. Halit Nahit Şendur is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Halit Nahit Şendur
36 papers receiving 303 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Halit Nahit Şendur
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Halit Nahit Şendur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Halit Nahit Şendur. The network helps show where Halit Nahit Şendur may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Halit Nahit Şendur
This map shows the geographic impact of Halit Nahit Şendur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Halit Nahit Şendur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Halit Nahit Şendur more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.