Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The efficacy of motivational interviewing: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.
20031.1k citationsBrian L. Burke, Hal Arkowitz et al.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Hal Arkowitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hal Arkowitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hal Arkowitz more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hal Arkowitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hal Arkowitz. The network helps show where Hal Arkowitz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hal Arkowitz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hal Arkowitz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hal Arkowitz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Hal Arkowitz. Hal Arkowitz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Arkowitz, Hal & Scott O. Lilienfeld. (2013). Is Divorce Bad for Children?. Scientific American Mind. 24(1). 68–69.5 indexed citations
2.
Arkowitz, Hal & Stanley B. Messer. (2011). Psychoanalytic Therapy and Behavior Therapy: Is Integration Possible?. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
Arkowitz, Hal & Scott O. Lilienfeld. (2009). Do the “Eyes” Have It?. Scientific American Mind. 21(1). 68–69.1 indexed citations
9.
Arkowitz, Hal, Henny A. Westra, William R. Miller, & Stephen Rollnick. (2008). Motivational interviewing in the treatment of psychological problems. Guilford Press eBooks.193 indexed citations
10.
Lilienfeld, Scott O. & Hal Arkowitz. (2008). Can Animals Aid Therapy?. Scientific American Mind. 19(3). 78–79.8 indexed citations
11.
Lilienfeld, Scott O. & Hal Arkowitz. (2007). EMDR: Taking a Closer Look. 17(4). 10–11.6 indexed citations
12.
Arkowitz, Hal & Scott O. Lilienfeld. (2006). Psychotherapy on Trial. Scientific American Mind. 17(2). 42–49.4 indexed citations
13.
Burke, Brian L., Hal Arkowitz, & Marisa Menchola. (2003). The efficacy of motivational interviewing: A meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 71(5). 843–861.1149 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.