H. Strecker

2.3k total citations
50 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

H. Strecker is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, H. Strecker has authored 50 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 8 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 7 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in H. Strecker's work include Neutrino Physics Research (25 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (23 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (22 papers). H. Strecker is often cited by papers focused on Neutrino Physics Research (25 papers), Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (23 papers) and Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (22 papers). H. Strecker collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Russia and Italy. H. Strecker's co-authors include G. Heusser, H. V. Klapdor‐Kleingrothaus, L. Baudis, V. I. Lebedev, S.T. Belyaev, A. Balysh, B. Majorovits, Heinrich Päs, Y. Ramachers and F. Petry and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Reports and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

H. Strecker

49 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
H. Strecker Germany 19 1.0k 133 111 101 32 50 1.1k
D. Bryman Canada 18 1.1k 1.1× 116 0.9× 78 0.7× 92 0.9× 30 0.9× 71 1.2k
A. Morales Spain 15 562 0.6× 191 1.4× 133 1.2× 110 1.1× 25 0.8× 63 640
J. Gulyás Hungary 15 685 0.7× 209 1.6× 80 0.7× 226 2.2× 11 0.3× 61 801
J. Puimedón Spain 17 604 0.6× 237 1.8× 122 1.1× 240 2.4× 47 1.5× 88 721
M.L. Sarsa Spain 16 546 0.5× 224 1.7× 116 1.0× 234 2.3× 46 1.4× 83 666
J.A. Villar Spain 18 701 0.7× 264 2.0× 139 1.3× 262 2.6× 48 1.5× 92 832
A. Ljubičić Croatia 13 357 0.4× 202 1.5× 51 0.5× 229 2.3× 19 0.6× 72 559
L.W. Mitchell Australia 15 558 0.5× 252 1.9× 120 1.1× 152 1.5× 14 0.4× 39 648
K.P. Pretzl Germany 14 552 0.5× 86 0.6× 60 0.5× 95 0.9× 40 1.3× 27 649
Marvin L. Marshak United States 18 809 0.8× 70 0.5× 107 1.0× 54 0.5× 37 1.2× 102 887

Countries citing papers authored by H. Strecker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Strecker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Strecker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Strecker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Strecker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Strecker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Strecker. The network helps show where H. Strecker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Strecker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Strecker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Strecker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. Strecker. H. Strecker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bonet, H., C. Buck, J. Hakenmüller, et al.. (2025). Publisher Erratum: CONUS+ Experiment. The European Physical Journal C. 85(1). 2 indexed citations
2.
Bonet, H., C. Buck, J. Hakenmüller, et al.. (2024). CONUS+ Experiment. The European Physical Journal C. 84(12). 7 indexed citations
3.
Bonet, H., A. Bonhomme, C. Buck, et al.. (2024). Pulse shape discrimination for the CONUS experiment in the keV and sub-keV regime. The European Physical Journal C. 84(2). 5 indexed citations
4.
Bonet, H., A. Bonhomme, C. Buck, et al.. (2024). Final CONUS Results on Coherent Elastic Neutrino-Nucleus Scattering at the Brokdorf Reactor. Physical Review Letters. 133(25). 251802–251802. 10 indexed citations
5.
Bonet, H., A. Bonhomme, C. Buck, et al.. (2023). Full background decomposition of the CONUS experiment. The European Physical Journal C. 83(3). 6 indexed citations
6.
Bonet, H., C. Buck, O. Chkvorets, et al.. (2023). Monte Carlo simulation of background components in low level Germanium spectrometry. Applied Radiation and Isotopes. 194. 110652–110652. 1 indexed citations
7.
Bonet, H., A. Bonhomme, C. Buck, et al.. (2022). First upper limits on neutrino electromagnetic properties from the CONUS experiment. The European Physical Journal C. 82(9). 28 indexed citations
8.
Bonet, H., A. Bonhomme, C. Buck, et al.. (2021). Constraints on Elastic Neutrino Nucleus Scattering in the Fully Coherent Regime from the CONUS Experiment. Physical Review Letters. 126(4). 41804–41804. 67 indexed citations
9.
Bonet, H., A. Bonhomme, C. Buck, et al.. (2021). Large-size sub-keV sensitive germanium detectors for the CONUS experiment. The European Physical Journal C. 81(3). 18 indexed citations
10.
Heusser, G., M. Weber, Roman Lackner, et al.. (2013). GIOVE, a shallow laboratory Ge-spectrometer with 100 μBq/kg sensitivity. AIP conference proceedings. 4 indexed citations
11.
Baudis, L., Alexander Dietz, G. Heusser, et al.. (2002). Direct dark matter detection and neutrinoless double beta decay with an array of 40 kg of `naked' natural Ge and 11 kg of enriched 76Ge detectors in liquid nitrogen. Astroparticle Physics. 17(3). 383–391. 2 indexed citations
12.
Baudis, L., Alexander Dietz, B. Majorovits, et al.. (2000). First results from the Heidelberg dark matter search experiment. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 63(2). 25 indexed citations
13.
Baudis, L., Alexander Dietz, G. Heusser, et al.. (1999). Limits on the Majorana Neutrino Mass in the 0.1 eV Range. Physical Review Letters. 83(1). 41–44. 190 indexed citations
14.
Baudis, L., J. Hellmig, G. Heusser, et al.. (1998). New limits on dark-matter weakly interacting particles from the Heidelberg-Moscow experiment. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 59(2). 41 indexed citations
15.
Günther, Michael, J. Hellmig, G. Heusser, et al.. (1996). Bounds on new Majoron models from the Heidelberg-Moscow experiment. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 54(5). 3641–3644. 16 indexed citations
16.
Balysh, A., M. Beck, S.T. Belyaev, et al.. (1992). The Heidelberg-Moscow double beta decay experiment with enriched 76Ge. First results. Physics Letters B. 283(1-2). 32–36. 54 indexed citations
17.
Persch, G. & H. Strecker. (1992). Applications of magnetic force microscopy in magnetic storage device manufacturing. Ultramicroscopy. 42-44. 1269–1274. 12 indexed citations
18.
Beck, M., M. Hirsch, H. V. Klapdor‐Kleingrothaus, et al.. (1992). New half life limits for the? ? 2v+0v decay of76Ge to the excited states of76Se from the Heidelberg-Moscow ?? experiment. The European Physical Journal A. 343(4). 397–400. 21 indexed citations
19.
Strecker, H. & G. Persch. (1990). Scanning tunneling microscopy and technical applications. Applied Surface Science. 46(1-4). 441–445. 2 indexed citations
20.
Gehrtz, M., et al.. (1988). Scanning tunneling microscopy of machined surfaces. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A Vacuum Surfaces and Films. 6(2). 432–435. 18 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by D. Bryman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. Morales Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Gulyás Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Puimedón Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M.L. Sarsa Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J.A. Villar Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. Ljubičić Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by L.W. Mitchell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by K.P. Pretzl Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Marvin L. Marshak
Rankless by CCL
2026