Countries citing papers authored by H. Richard Lane
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of H. Richard Lane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Richard Lane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Richard Lane more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Richard Lane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Richard Lane. The network helps show where H. Richard Lane may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Richard Lane
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Richard Lane.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Richard Lane based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with H. Richard Lane. H. Richard Lane is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lane, H. Richard, et al.. (2012). Developing a consistent sequence stratigraphy for the Wilkes Land and Great Australian Bight margins. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).3 indexed citations
3.
Lane, H. Richard, et al.. (1999). Treatise of Petroleum Geology / Handbook of Petroleum Geology: Exploring for Oil and Gas Traps. Chapter 17: Applied Paleontology. 17-1–17-65.1 indexed citations
Wang, Zhihao, Stig M. Bergström, & H. Richard Lane. (1996). Conodont provinces and biostratigraphy in Ordovician of China. 35(1). 26–59.59 indexed citations
Klapper, Gilbert & H. Richard Lane. (1988). Frasnian (Upper Devonian) Conodont Sequence at Luscar Mountain and Mount Haultain, Alberta Rocky Mountains. 469–478.22 indexed citations
9.
Wang, Zhihao, H. Richard Lane, & Walter L. Manger. (1987). Carboniferous and Early Permian conodont zonation of North and Northwest China.13 indexed citations
10.
Wang, Zhihao, H. Richard Lane, & Walter L. Manger. (1987). Conodont sequence across the mid-Carboniferous boundary in China and its correlation with England and North America.10 indexed citations
11.
Klapper, Gilbert & H. Richard Lane. (1985). Upper Devonian (Frasnian) conodonts of the Polygnathus biofacies, N.W.T., Canada. Journal of Paleontology. 59(4). 904–951.70 indexed citations
Lane, H. Richard. (1975). Correlation of the Mississippian Rocks of Southern New Mexico and West Texas Utilizing Conodonts. 87–97.2 indexed citations
15.
Toomey, Donald Francis, et al.. (1974). The biota of the Pennsylvanian (Virgilian) Leavenworth Limestone, midcontinent region; Part 5, Distribution of miscellaneous microfossils. Journal of Paleontology. 48(6). 1156–1165.2 indexed citations
16.
Lane, H. Richard. (1974). Icriodus taimyricus (Conodonta) from the Salmontrout Limestone (lower Devonian), Alaska. Journal of Paleontology. 48(4). 721–726.4 indexed citations
17.
Brenckle, Paul L., et al.. (1973). Upper Paleozoic Biozonation in the Unit No. 19 Well, Church Buttes Field, Uinta County, Wyoming. 165–171.5 indexed citations
Lane, H. Richard. (1968). Symmetry in conodont element-pairs. Journal of Paleontology. 42(5). 1258–1263.37 indexed citations
20.
Lane, H. Richard. (1967). Uppermost Mississippian and Lower Pennsylvanian conodonts from the type Morrowan region, Arkansas. Journal of Paleontology. 41(4). 920–942.44 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.