Countries citing papers authored by H. Rex Hartson
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of H. Rex Hartson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Rex Hartson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Rex Hartson more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Rex Hartson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Rex Hartson. The network helps show where H. Rex Hartson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Rex Hartson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Rex Hartson.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Rex Hartson based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with H. Rex Hartson. H. Rex Hartson is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Judge, Tejinder K., Pardha S. Pyla, D. Scott McCrickard, Steve Harrison, & H. Rex Hartson. (2013). Studying Group Decision Making in Affinity Diagramming. VTechWorks (Virginia Tech).6 indexed citations
2.
Hartson, H. Rex, et al.. (1999). The User Action Framework: A Theory-Based Foundation for Inspection and Classification of Usability Problems. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 1058–1062.23 indexed citations
3.
Hix, Deborah & H. Rex Hartson. (1993). Formative evaluation: ensuring usability in user interfaces. VTechWorks (Virginia Tech). 1–30.15 indexed citations
Hartson, H. Rex & Deborah Hix. (1993). Advances in human-computer interaction (vol. 3). Ablex Publishing Corp. eBooks.3 indexed citations
6.
Hix, Deborah & H. Rex Hartson. (1993). Developing user interfaces: ensuring usability through product & process. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks.452 indexed citations
7.
Paretti, Marie, et al.. (1993). Task-Oriented User Documentation Using the User Action Notation: A Case Study.. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 421–426.1 indexed citations
8.
Hartson, H. Rex, et al.. (1993). A Model of Behavioral Techniques for Representing User Interface Designs.. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 861–866.2 indexed citations
9.
Hartson, H. Rex, et al.. (1992). Different languages for different development activities: behavioral representation techniques for user interface design. 303–326.
10.
Hix, Deborah, et al.. (1991). The UAN: a notation to support user-centered design of direct manipulation interfaces. 157–194.3 indexed citations
Hartson, H. Rex, et al.. (1990). Notational Techniques for Accommodating User Intention Shifts. VTechWorks (Virginia Tech).3 indexed citations
13.
Hartson, H. Rex, et al.. (1989). Empirically determined guidelines for use of human-computer interface recording techniques. International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. 667–674.1 indexed citations
Hix, Deborah & H. Rex Hartson. (1985). An Interactive Environment for Dialogue Development: Its Design, Use and Evaluation. VTechWorks (Virginia Tech).8 indexed citations
Roach, John, et al.. (1982). DMS. 102–105.9 indexed citations
20.
Hartson, H. Rex & David K. Hsiao. (1976). A Semantic Model for Data Base Protection Languages. Very Large Data Bases. 27–42.20 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.