H. Leeb

1.7k total citations
64 papers, 733 citations indexed

About

H. Leeb is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, H. Leeb has authored 64 papers receiving a total of 733 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 25 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 24 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in H. Leeb's work include Nuclear physics research studies (31 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (22 papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (17 papers). H. Leeb is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (31 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (22 papers) and Nuclear reactor physics and engineering (17 papers). H. Leeb collaborates with scholars based in Austria, South Africa and Germany. H. Leeb's co-authors include Jörg Schmiedmayer, S. A. Sofianos, Denise Neudecker, H. Fiedeldey, Leslie J. Allen, R. Lipperheide, H. Abele, Tobias Jenke, L. J. Allen and H. M. L. Faulkner and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

H. Leeb

61 papers receiving 718 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
H. Leeb Austria	16	377	312	248	149	85	64	733
P. Sona Italy	20	884 2.3×	419 1.3×	467 1.9×	120 0.8×	86 1.0×	106	1.2k
R. W. Fearick South Africa	16	456 1.2×	210 0.7×	191 0.8×	33 0.2×	144 1.7×	60	723
H. Bokemeyer Germany	14	863 2.3×	540 1.7×	204 0.8×	33 0.2×	57 0.7×	32	1.2k
N. Sasao Japan	18	1.2k 3.2×	469 1.5×	221 0.9×	55 0.4×	19 0.2×	92	1.7k
G. Clausnitzer Germany	16	363 1.0×	382 1.2×	234 0.9×	103 0.7×	42 0.5×	56	678
D. M. Skopik Canada	18	639 1.7×	358 1.1×	251 1.0×	45 0.3×	27 0.3×	77	902
Th. Walcher Germany	22	1.1k 3.0×	568 1.8×	386 1.6×	156 1.0×	68 0.8×	61	1.5k
Y. Torizuka Japan	19	976 2.6×	709 2.3×	380 1.5×	178 1.2×	36 0.4×	52	1.3k
N. C. Hien United States	16	661 1.8×	230 0.7×	134 0.5×	34 0.2×	91 1.1×	25	1.1k
G. R. Ringo United States	16	322 0.9×	357 1.1×	223 0.9×	59 0.4×	59 0.7×	32	775

Countries citing papers authored by H. Leeb

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. Leeb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Leeb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Leeb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. Leeb

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Leeb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Leeb. The network helps show where H. Leeb may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Leeb

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Leeb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Leeb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. Leeb. H. Leeb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Leeb, H., et al.. (2024). Towards a Bayesian evaluation technique for light nuclear systems. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 294. 4006–4006.

Dimitriou, P., Zhenpeng Chen, R. J. deBoer, et al.. (2023). Evaluation of light-element reactions in the resolved resonance region. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 284. 3002–3002.

Leeb, H., et al.. (2019). Formulation of Model Defects Suitable for the Resonance Regime. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 211. 7006–7006. 1 indexed citations

Thompson, I. J., R. J. deBoer, P. Dimitriou, et al.. (2019). Verification of R-matrix calculations for charged-particle reactions in the resolved resonance region for the 7Be system. The European Physical Journal A. 55(6). 9 indexed citations

Leeb, H., et al.. (2015). Bayesian Evaluation Including Covariance Matrices of Neutron-induced Reaction Cross Sections of 181Ta. Nuclear Data Sheets. 123. 153–158. 3 indexed citations

Neudecker, Denise, et al.. (2011). Comparison of Covariance Matrices Obtained by Different Methods. Journal of the Korean Physical Society. 59(2(3)). 1272–1275. 3 indexed citations

Abele, H., Tobias Jenke, H. Leeb, & Jörg Schmiedmayer. (2010). Ramsey’s method of separated oscillating fields and its application to gravitationally induced quantum phase shifts. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 81(6). 67 indexed citations

Sofianos, S. A., et al.. (2007). Design of quantum filters with pre-determined reflection and transmission properties. Microelectronics Journal. 38(2). 235–244. 6 indexed citations

Leeb, H., M. C. Simon, K. Nikolics, & J. S. Kasper. (2007). Reconstruction of magnetic profiles from polarized reflectivity data. Physica B Condensed Matter. 397(1-2). 50–52. 1 indexed citations

10.

Allen, Leslie J., H. M. L. Faulkner, & H. Leeb. (2000). Inversion of dynamical electron diffraction data including absorption. Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography. 56(2). 119–126. 30 indexed citations

11.

Allen, Leslie J., H. Leeb, & A.E.C. Spargo. (1999). Retrieval of the projected potential by inversion from the scattering matrix in electron–crystal scattering. Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations of Crystallography. 55(2). 105–111. 20 indexed citations

12.

Leeb, H., et al.. (1998). Spin-orbit potentials from inversion: relativistic versus nonrelativistic schemes. Journal of Physics G Nuclear and Particle Physics. 24(7). 1287–1300. 4 indexed citations

13.

Adam, R. M., H. Fiedeldey, S. A. Sofianos, & H. Leeb. (1993). Error propagation from nucleon-nucleon data to three- and four-nucleon binding energies. Nuclear Physics A. 559(2). 157–172. 6 indexed citations

14.

Allen, L. J., Christopher Steward, K. Amos, et al.. (1993). An optical potential from inversion of the 350 MeV 16O-16O scattering data. Physics Letters B. 298(1-2). 36–40. 22 indexed citations

15.

Leeb, H.. (1991). The reliability of a finite-difference method for the solution of the inverse scattering problem. Nuclear Physics A. 529(2). 253–267. 2 indexed citations

16.

Steward, Christopher, K. Amos, H. Leeb, et al.. (1991). Mass and charge attributes of heavy ion potentials obtained by inversion. Physical Review C. 44(4). 1493–1499. 4 indexed citations

17.

Leeb, H. & Erich W. Schmid. (1986). Test of effective cluster interactions by pion scattering. Few-Body Systems. 1(4). 203–221. 1 indexed citations

18.

Leeb, H. & F. Osterfeld. (1985). Microscopic approach to the alpha-particle-nucleus optical potential. Physical Review C. 32(3). 789–795. 1 indexed citations

19.

Leeb, H. & Erich W. Schmid. (1980). A physical interpretation of the discrete ambiguities in the optical potential for composite particles. The European Physical Journal A. 296(1). 51–54. 8 indexed citations

20.

Leeb, H., et al.. (1977). Shell effects in the neutron-nucleus optical potential. Journal of Physics G Nuclear Physics. 3(6). L127–L128. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact