Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The SAURON project--IV. The mass-to-light ratio, the virial mass estimator and the Fundamental Plane of elliptical and lenticular galaxies
2006644 citationsMichele Cappellari, Roland Bacon et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyprofile →
The SAURON project--V. Integral-field emission-line kinematics of 48 elliptical and lenticular galaxies
2006507 citationsM. Sarzi, J. Falcón‐Barroso et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyprofile →
The SAURON project - IX. A kinematic classification for early-type galaxies
2007475 citationsMichele Cappellari, Glenn van de Ven et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyprofile →
The SAURON project - X. The orbital anisotropy of elliptical and lenticular galaxies: revisiting the (V/ , ) diagram with integral-field stellar kinematics
2007366 citationsMichele Cappellari, Éric Emsellem et al.Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Societyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of H. Kuntschner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. Kuntschner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. Kuntschner more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. Kuntschner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. Kuntschner. The network helps show where H. Kuntschner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. Kuntschner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. Kuntschner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. Kuntschner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with H. Kuntschner. H. Kuntschner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Feldmeier, A., Nadine Neumayer, Anil C. Seth, et al.. (2025). A spectroscopic map of the Galactic centre. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 696. A213–A213.3 indexed citations
Arsenault, R., P. Y. Madec, Elise Vernet, et al.. (2016). Adaptive Optics Facility Status Report: When First Light Is Produced Rather Than Captured. Msngr. 164. 2–7.2 indexed citations
Amico, Paola, P. González de Santos, Douglas M. Summers, et al.. (2015). The First Component of the Adaptive Optics Facility Enters Operations: The Laser Traffic Control System on Paranal. Msngr. 162. 19–23.1 indexed citations
12.
Arsenault, R., J. Paufique, Johann Kolb, et al.. (2014). The Adaptive Optics Facility Module GRAAL on its Way to Final Validation. The Messenger. 156. 2.3 indexed citations
Kuntschner, H., H. Bushouse, J. R. Walsh, & M. Kümmel. (2008). The TV2 ground calibrations of the WFC3 NIR grisms. 15.1 indexed citations
20.
Kuntschner, H.. (1998). The star formation history of early-type galaxies in the fornax cluster. OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.