H. E. Stanton

454 total citations
11 papers, 272 citations indexed

About

H. E. Stanton is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy and Radiation. According to data from OpenAlex, H. E. Stanton has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 272 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 5 papers in Spectroscopy and 4 papers in Radiation. Recurrent topics in H. E. Stanton's work include Atomic and Molecular Physics (7 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (5 papers) and Ion-surface interactions and analysis (4 papers). H. E. Stanton is often cited by papers focused on Atomic and Molecular Physics (7 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (5 papers) and Ion-surface interactions and analysis (4 papers). H. E. Stanton collaborates with scholars based in United States. H. E. Stanton's co-authors include J. E. Monahan, Mark G. Inghram, J. D. Morrison, W. A. Chupka, H. Diamond, L. S. Goodman, S. Wexler and Mark Fred and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Applied Physics and Review of Scientific Instruments.

In The Last Decade

H. E. Stanton

11 papers receiving 235 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
H. E. Stanton United States	9	158	139	66	48	44	11	272
Larkin Kerwin Canada	11	324 2.1×	228 1.6×	55 0.8×	34 0.7×	48 1.1×	34	455
D. M. J. Compton United States	7	190 1.2×	129 0.9×	46 0.7×	54 1.1×	27 0.6×	20	344
E. Heinicke Germany	12	284 1.8×	128 0.9×	80 1.2×	29 0.6×	58 1.3×	18	393
Lars Wåhlin United States	7	152 1.0×	127 0.9×	115 1.7×	66 1.4×	67 1.5×	18	357
D. W. Magnuson United States	8	118 0.7×	73 0.5×	24 0.4×	40 0.8×	15 0.3×	13	279
J. A. Hipple United States	3	92 0.6×	141 1.0×	25 0.4×	13 0.3×	53 1.2×	3	261
D. T. Terwilliger United States	11	345 2.2×	381 2.7×	90 1.4×	55 1.1×	22 0.5×	16	517
Joop Schopman Netherlands	11	320 2.0×	245 1.8×	57 0.9×	23 0.5×	38 0.9×	19	382
R. K. Curran United States	10	264 1.7×	198 1.4×	23 0.3×	33 0.7×	21 0.5×	10	370
W. Hanle Germany	8	242 1.5×	108 0.8×	15 0.2×	39 0.8×	48 1.1×	40	352

Countries citing papers authored by H. E. Stanton

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. E. Stanton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. E. Stanton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. E. Stanton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. E. Stanton

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. E. Stanton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. E. Stanton. The network helps show where H. E. Stanton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. E. Stanton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. E. Stanton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. E. Stanton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. E. Stanton. H. E. Stanton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

Goodman, L. S., H. Diamond, & H. E. Stanton. (1975). Nuclear and atomic moments and hyperfine-structure parameters ofEs253andEs254m. Physical review. A, General physics. 11(2). 499–504. 27 indexed citations

Goodman, L. S., H. Diamond, H. E. Stanton, & Mark Fred. (1971). gJValue for the Atomic Ground State of Fermium. Physical review. A, General physics. 4(2). 473–475. 4 indexed citations

Stanton, H. E. & S. Wexler. (1966). Kinetic Energies of Products of Ion—Molecule Reactions. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 44(8). 2959–2968. 6 indexed citations

Stanton, H. E. & J. E. Monahan. (1964). On the Kinetic-Energy Distribution of Fragment Ions Produced by Electron Impact in a Mass Spectrometer. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 41(12). 3694–3702. 36 indexed citations

Monahan, J. E. & H. E. Stanton. (1962). Mass Spectra Resulting from High-Energy Electron Impact on Some Hydrocarbon Molecules. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 37(11). 2654–2661. 8 indexed citations

Stanton, H. E.. (1960). On the Yield and Energy Distribution of Secondary Positive Ions from Metal Surfaces. Journal of Applied Physics. 31(4). 678–683. 36 indexed citations

Stanton, H. E. & J. E. Monahan. (1960). Cross Section for Formation of Doubly-Ionized Helium by Electron Impact. Physical Review. 119(2). 711–715. 19 indexed citations

Morrison, J. D., et al.. (1960). Threshold Law for the Probability of Excitation of Molecules by Photon Impact. A Study of the Photoionization Efficiencies of Br2, I2, HI, and CH3I. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 33(3). 821–824. 73 indexed citations

Stanton, H. E.. (1959). High-Energy Methyl Ions from Propane under Electron Impact. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 30(4). 1116–1117. 13 indexed citations

10.

Morrison, J. D. & H. E. Stanton. (1958). Fragmentation of Methane by Electron Impact, and the Latent Heat of Sublimation of Carbon. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 28(1). 9–11. 9 indexed citations

11.

Stanton, H. E., W. A. Chupka, & Mark G. Inghram. (1956). Electron Multipliers in Mass Spectrometry; Effect of Molecular Structure. Review of Scientific Instruments. 27(2). 109–109. 41 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact