H. B. BOYD

782 total citations · 1 hit paper
9 papers, 534 citations indexed

About

H. B. BOYD is a scholar working on Surgery, Epidemiology and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, H. B. BOYD has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 534 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Surgery, 3 papers in Epidemiology and 2 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in H. B. BOYD's work include Hip disorders and treatments (3 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (3 papers) and Hip and Femur Fractures (3 papers). H. B. BOYD is often cited by papers focused on Hip disorders and treatments (3 papers), Bone fractures and treatments (3 papers) and Hip and Femur Fractures (3 papers). H. B. BOYD collaborates with scholars based in United States. H. B. BOYD's co-authors include Lewis D. Anderson, Fred P. Sage and D.B. Zilversmit and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research and PubMed.

In The Last Decade

H. B. BOYD

8 papers receiving 468 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

A Method for Reinsertion of the Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon

1961 308 citations H. B. BOYD, Lewis D. Anderson Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
H. B. BOYD United States	8	458	313	110	34	33	9	534
John C. Kelleher United States	9	299 0.7×	84 0.3×	90 0.8×	12 0.4×	27 0.8×	96	397
Fred P. Sage United States	8	281 0.6×	151 0.5×	283 2.6×	4 0.1×	31 0.9×	8	348
D. A. Sherlock United Kingdom	15	482 1.1×	219 0.7×	109 1.0×	55 1.6×	20 0.6×	26	540
Linscheid Rl United States	11	312 0.7×	124 0.4×	61 0.6×	30 0.9×	110 3.3×	22	357
A Axer Israel	13	543 1.2×	56 0.2×	67 0.6×	54 1.6×	80 2.4×	43	576
A P Weiss United States	10	430 0.9×	195 0.6×	128 1.2×	34 1.0×	66 2.0×	13	474
P Vichard France	10	319 0.7×	115 0.4×	109 1.0×	54 1.6×	17 0.5×	81	358
Timothy E. Radomisli United States	11	411 0.9×	116 0.4×	204 1.9×	120 3.5×	16 0.5×	14	527
G. A. Robertson Canada	10	294 0.6×	76 0.2×	25 0.2×	47 1.4×	21 0.6×	21	337
H Kelikian United States	7	291 0.6×	68 0.2×	52 0.5×	208 6.1×	54 1.6×	14	503

Countries citing papers authored by H. B. BOYD

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H. B. BOYD's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. B. BOYD with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. B. BOYD more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H. B. BOYD

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. B. BOYD. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. B. BOYD. The network helps show where H. B. BOYD may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. B. BOYD

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. B. BOYD. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. B. BOYD based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. B. BOYD. H. B. BOYD is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

BOYD, H. B., et al.. (1982). Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 165. 16–32.

2.

BOYD, H. B.. (1965). Symposium. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 47(1). 167–168. 7 indexed citations

3.

BOYD, H. B., et al.. (1965). Changing Concepts in the Treatment of Nonunion. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 43(1). 37–54. 18 indexed citations

4.

BOYD, H. B., et al.. (1964). Acute Fracture of the Femoral Neck. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 46(5). 1066–1068. 42 indexed citations

5.

BOYD, H. B., et al.. (1963). Further observations on the use of radioactive phosphorus (P32) to determine the viability of the head of the femur. Correlation of clinical and experimental data in 130 patients with fractures of the femoral neck.. PubMed. 45-A. 445–60. 16 indexed citations

6.

BOYD, H. B. & Lewis D. Anderson. (1961). A Method for Reinsertion of the Distal Biceps Brachii Tendon. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 43(7). 1041–1043. 308 indexed citations breakdown →

7.

BOYD, H. B. & Fred P. Sage. (1958). Congenital Pseudarthrosis of the Tibia. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 40(6). 1245–1379. 94 indexed citations

8.

BOYD, H. B., et al.. (1957). Nonunion of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures.. PubMed. 104(4). 463–70. 22 indexed citations

9.

BOYD, H. B., et al.. (1955). THE USE OF RADIO-ACTIVE PHOSPHORUS (P32) TO DETERMINE THE VIABILITY OF THE HEAD OF THE FEMUR. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. 37(2). 260–276. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact