Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Joining of carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites and aluminium alloys – A review
2017531 citationsAlokesh Pramanik, Guy Littlefair et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Guy Littlefair
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Guy Littlefair's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guy Littlefair with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guy Littlefair more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guy Littlefair. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guy Littlefair. The network helps show where Guy Littlefair may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Guy Littlefair
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Guy Littlefair.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Guy Littlefair based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Guy Littlefair. Guy Littlefair is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Horan, Ben, Sivachandran Chandrasekaran, Alex Stojcevski, & Guy Littlefair. (2014). First year electronics not only for first year electronics students - how to ensure engagement through innovation. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 607–614.
9.
Chandrasekaran, Sivachandran, Guy Littlefair, Matthew Joordens, & Alex Stojcevski. (2014). Distance Education and On-campus Students' Perceptions of Collaborative Learning in Engineering. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology). 55–60.2 indexed citations
10.
Polishetty, Ashwin, et al.. (2014). Slot machining of TI6AL4V with trochoidal milling technique. Journal of Machine Engineering. 14(4). 42–55.11 indexed citations
Chandrasekaran, Sivachandran, Alex Stojcevski, Guy Littlefair, & Matthew Joordens. (2013). Project-Oriented Design-Based Learning: Aligning Students' Views With Industry Needs*. International journal of engineering education. 29(5). 1109–1118.55 indexed citations
13.
Chandrasekaran, Sivachandran, Amanullah Maung Than Oo, Alex Stojcevski, & Guy Littlefair. (2013). Best assessment practices of final year engineering projects in Australia. RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library). 1–17.6 indexed citations
Chandrasekaran, Sivachandran, Alex Stojcevski, Guy Littlefair, & Matthew Joordens. (2013). Aligning students and staff perspectives in an engineering design curriculum. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University).2 indexed citations
16.
Polishetty, Ashwin, et al.. (2013). Machinability assessment of Ti-6Al-4V for aerospace applications. Deakin Research Online (Deakin University). 53–58.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.