Guillaume Hoffmann

21 papers receiving 207 citations

Peers

Guillaume Hoffmann
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 63
  • Process Chemistry and Technology 10
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 27
  • Organic Chemistry 56
  • Artificial Intelligence 62
Replace Taewon David Kim with:
Taewon David Kim Canada
Siyuan Liu China
Wouter Heyndrickx Norway
Changsu Cao China
Rahul Maitra India
Thomas Tuerk Germany
Patryk A. Wesołowski Poland
S. E. Rasmussen Denmark
Amanda Dewyer United States
Felix Zeller Germany
Guillaume Hoffmann relative to Taewon David Kim Canada Taewon David Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.4×
Taewon David Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Guillaume Hoffmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Guillaume Hoffmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guillaume Hoffmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guillaume Hoffmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Guillaume Hoffmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guillaume Hoffmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guillaume Hoffmann. The network helps show where Guillaume Hoffmann may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Guillaume Hoffmann, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Guillaume Hoffmann Line = papers co-authored together Guillaume Hoffmann links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202034
2 201824
3 201523
4 202019
5 201818
6 201314
7 201914
8 198813
9 200912
10 20236
11 20246
12 20186
13 20225
14 20243
15 20103
16 20163
17 20242
18 20232
19
HTab: A Terminating Tableaux System for Hybrid Logic
20072
20 20221

About Guillaume Hoffmann

Guillaume Hoffmann is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Organic Chemistry, Artificial Intelligence, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 25 papers that have together received 211 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Computational Drug Discovery Methods (7 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (6 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (6 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (5 papers), Chemical Reaction Mechanisms (4 papers), Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies (3 papers), Semantic Web and Ontologies (3 papers) and Crystallography and molecular interactions (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Computational Theory and Mathematics (63 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (10 citations), Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (27 citations), Organic Chemistry (56 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (62 citations). Guillaume Hoffmann has collaborated with scholars based in France, Argentina and Algeria. Frequent co-authors include Laurent Joubert, Vincent Tognetti, Carlos Areces, Raul Fervari, Benoît Gaüzère, Pierre Héroux, Sébastien Adam, Muhammet Balcılar, Christophe Morell and Henry Chermette. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical Chemistry Accounts, Journal of Computational Chemistry, Logic Journal of IGPL, Journal of Molecular Modeling and The Journal of Physical Chemistry A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact