Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the fourth working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004—BHS IV
2004872 citationsBryan Williams, N. Poulter et al.Journal of Human Hypertensionprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of GT McInnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by GT McInnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites GT McInnes more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by GT McInnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by GT McInnes. The network helps show where GT McInnes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of GT McInnes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of GT McInnes.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of GT McInnes based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with GT McInnes. GT McInnes is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Östergren, Jan, N. Poulter, Björn Dahlöf, et al.. (2006). The Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial: Blood pressure-lowering limb (ASCOT-BPLA): effects in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 49. 136–137.6 indexed citations
2.
Williams, Bryan, N. Poulter, Morris J. Brown, et al.. (2004). Guidelines for management of hypertension: report of the fourth working party of the British Hypertension Society, 2004—BHS IV. Journal of Human Hypertension. 18(3). 139–185.872 indexed citations breakdown →
Ankier, S. I., et al.. (1993). Influence of hepatic impairment on the pharmacokinetics of single doses of mirtazapine in elderly subjects. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 35(1). 76.6 indexed citations
8.
McInnes, GT, et al.. (1993). Patients' attitudes to participation in clinical trials.. PubMed. 35(2). 204–7.84 indexed citations
9.
Waller, Patrick, GT McInnes, & JL Reid. (1990). Policies for managing hypertensive patients: a survey of the opinions of British specialists.. PubMed. 4(5). 509–15.6 indexed citations
10.
Waller, Patrick, C. Isles, A. F. Lever, Gordon Murray, & GT McInnes. (1988). Does therapeutic reduction of diastolic blood pressure cause death from coronary heart disease?. PubMed. 2(1). 7–10.40 indexed citations
11.
McInnes, GT, et al.. (1986). INTRAVENOUS VERAPAMIL DURING BETA-ADRENOCEPTOR BLOCKADE WITH PROPRANOLOL. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 21(5).5 indexed citations
12.
McInnes, GT, et al.. (1986). ORAL AND INTRAVENOUS ADMINISTRATION OF VERAPAMIL DURING BETA-BLOCKADE WITH PROPRANOLOL. Pharmacology & Toxicology. 59. 181–181.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.