Greg Haggerty

574 total citations
32 papers, 404 citations indexed

About

Greg Haggerty is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Greg Haggerty has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 404 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Clinical Psychology, 11 papers in Social Psychology and 7 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Greg Haggerty's work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (10 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (9 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (9 papers). Greg Haggerty is often cited by papers focused on Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (10 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (9 papers) and Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (9 papers). Greg Haggerty collaborates with scholars based in United States. Greg Haggerty's co-authors include Mark J. Hilsenroth, Caleb J. Siefert, Mark A. Blais, Samuel Justin Sinclair, Margaret Blake, Joel Weinberger, Michelle B. Stein, Jairo N. Fuertes, Jenelle Slavin‐Mulford and Pratibha Agarwal and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Psychological Assessment and The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.

In The Last Decade

Greg Haggerty

30 papers receiving 384 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Greg Haggerty United States 11 264 162 65 61 56 32 404
Jason A. Seidel United States 6 302 1.1× 154 1.0× 59 0.9× 54 0.9× 44 0.8× 9 393
Gisela Unsworth United Kingdom 3 228 0.9× 105 0.6× 48 0.7× 49 0.8× 74 1.3× 4 353
Tracy Mullin United Kingdom 7 263 1.0× 136 0.8× 51 0.8× 66 1.1× 82 1.5× 7 399
Don Thompson United States 3 272 1.0× 148 0.9× 71 1.1× 76 1.2× 47 0.8× 3 386
Paula Errázuriz Chile 12 307 1.2× 123 0.8× 45 0.7× 91 1.5× 43 0.8× 20 411
Norah C. Slone United States 8 301 1.1× 153 0.9× 72 1.1× 34 0.6× 55 1.0× 9 397
Denise Meuldijk Australia 9 260 1.0× 102 0.6× 52 0.8× 83 1.4× 75 1.3× 15 417
Michael Worrell United Kingdom 7 346 1.3× 133 0.8× 51 0.8× 186 3.0× 32 0.6× 13 460
Debra Theobald McClendon United States 4 256 1.0× 142 0.9× 46 0.7× 38 0.6× 31 0.6× 4 346
Kirk M. Lunnen United States 6 293 1.1× 110 0.7× 51 0.8× 86 1.4× 59 1.1× 8 429

Countries citing papers authored by Greg Haggerty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Greg Haggerty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Greg Haggerty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Greg Haggerty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Greg Haggerty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Greg Haggerty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Greg Haggerty. The network helps show where Greg Haggerty may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Greg Haggerty

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Greg Haggerty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Greg Haggerty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Greg Haggerty. Greg Haggerty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rana, Vishal Singh, et al.. (2023). COVID-19 Mask Mandates in NY and Their Effect on the Incidence of Flu. Journal of Community Hospital Internal Medicine Perspectives. 13(1). 1–5. 2 indexed citations
3.
Kaell, Alan, et al.. (2021). Increasing Awareness of Palliative Medicine With the Emergency Department: A Quality Improvement Project. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®. 39(2). 160–163.
4.
Haggerty, Greg, et al.. (2020). Educating Internal Medicine Residents on Palliative Medicine and Hospice Care at a Community Teaching Hospital. American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine®. 38(7). 741–744. 3 indexed citations
5.
Haggerty, Greg, et al.. (2018). Dimensional measure of self and interpersonal functioning: Comparisons with treatment alliance and readiness for inpatient psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 25(4). 575–582. 3 indexed citations
6.
Siefert, Caleb J., Michelle B. Stein, Jenelle Slavin‐Mulford, et al.. (2016). Estimating the Effects of Thematic Apperception Test Card Content on SCORS–G Ratings: Replication With a Nonclinical Sample. Journal of Personality Assessment. 98(6). 598–607. 18 indexed citations
7.
Haggerty, Greg, et al.. (2016). Reliability and Validity of Prototype Diagnosis for Adolescent Psychopathology. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 204(4). 287–290. 2 indexed citations
8.
Haggerty, Greg, et al.. (2015). Correlates of interpersonal dependency and detachment in an adolescent inpatient sample. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic. 79(4). 281–304. 5 indexed citations
9.
Haggerty, Greg, et al.. (2015). Construct Validity of the Relationship Profile Test: Links With Measures of Psychopathology and Adult Attachment. Journal of Personality Assessment. 98(1). 82–87. 6 indexed citations
10.
Sinclair, Samuel Justin, Wei‐Jean Chung, Rachel E. Liebman, et al.. (2014). Extending the Validity of the Personality Assessment Inventory's (PAI) Level of Care Index (LOCI) in Multiple Psychiatric Settings. Journal of Personality Assessment. 97(2). 145–152. 8 indexed citations
11.
DeFife, Jared A., et al.. (2014). Clinical Validity of Prototype Personality Disorder Ratings in Adolescents. Journal of Personality Assessment. 97(3). 271–277. 2 indexed citations
12.
Haggerty, Greg, et al.. (2014). Assessing Overall Functioning With Adolescent Inpatients. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 202(11). 822–828. 1 indexed citations
13.
Haggerty, Greg, Matthew R. Baity, Jared A. DeFife, et al.. (2014). Clinical Validity of a Dimensional Assessment of Self- and Interpersonal Functioning in Adolescent Inpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment. 97(1). 3–12. 10 indexed citations
14.
Sinclair, Samuel Justin, Jenelle Slavin‐Mulford, Daniel Antonius, et al.. (2013). Development and preliminary validation of the Level of Care Index (LOCI) from the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) in a psychiatric sample.. Psychological Assessment. 25(2). 606–617. 10 indexed citations
15.
Haggerty, Greg, et al.. (2013). A Brief Measure of Psychological Health and Well-Being. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 201(3). 216–221. 9 indexed citations
16.
Haggerty, Greg, et al.. (2013). A Brief Inpatient Measure of Global Psychiatric Symptom Severity. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 201(11). 971–976. 13 indexed citations
17.
Haggerty, Greg, et al.. (2012). Construct Validity of the Schwartz Outcome Scale. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. 200(4). 343–348. 7 indexed citations
18.
Agarwal, Pratibha, et al.. (2011). Alzheimer’s Disease – Not an Exaggeration of Healthy Aging. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 33(2). 106–114. 15 indexed citations
19.
Haggerty, Greg, Margaret Blake, & Caleb J. Siefert. (2010). Convergent and divergent validity of the relationship profile test: investigating the relationship with attachment, interpersonal distress and psychological health. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 66(4). 339–354. 23 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026