Graham G. Walmsley

973 total citations
16 papers, 678 citations indexed

About

Graham G. Walmsley is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Genetics and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Graham G. Walmsley has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 678 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Rehabilitation, 8 papers in Genetics and 6 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Graham G. Walmsley's work include Wound Healing and Treatments (9 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (8 papers) and Body Contouring and Surgery (2 papers). Graham G. Walmsley is often cited by papers focused on Wound Healing and Treatments (9 papers), Mesenchymal stem cell research (8 papers) and Body Contouring and Surgery (2 papers). Graham G. Walmsley collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Austria. Graham G. Walmsley's co-authors include Michael S. Hu, Michael T. Longaker, Zeshaan N. Maan, Derrick C. Wan, Robert C. Rennert, H. Peter Lorenz, Tripp Leavitt, Elizabeth R. Zielins, Geoffrey C. Gurtner and Alexander T. M. Cheung and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.

In The Last Decade

Graham G. Walmsley

16 papers receiving 669 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Graham G. Walmsley United States	12	278	242	177	171	148	16	678
Scott Maxson United States	7	380 1.4×	292 1.2×	134 0.8×	208 1.2×	160 1.1×	8	712
Kshemendra Senarath-Yapa United States	18	263 0.9×	211 0.9×	261 1.5×	284 1.7×	151 1.0×	33	906
Jin Yu Liu China	15	251 0.9×	151 0.6×	249 1.4×	222 1.3×	166 1.1×	29	672
Charlotte Lequeux France	15	302 1.1×	177 0.7×	141 0.8×	282 1.6×	120 0.8×	20	742
Sacha Khong United States	10	251 0.9×	199 0.8×	143 0.8×	167 1.0×	180 1.2×	12	712
Janos A. Barrera United States	12	223 0.8×	526 2.2×	153 0.9×	252 1.5×	358 2.4×	30	933
Nadine Matthias United States	12	331 1.2×	187 0.8×	278 1.6×	297 1.7×	270 1.8×	18	761
H. Peter Lorenz United States	15	113 0.4×	397 1.6×	177 1.0×	191 1.1×	149 1.0×	31	835
In‐Su Park South Korea	17	257 0.9×	100 0.4×	174 1.0×	234 1.4×	170 1.1×	32	700
Melanie R. Major United States	8	211 0.8×	280 1.2×	97 0.5×	251 1.5×	292 2.0×	19	724

Countries citing papers authored by Graham G. Walmsley

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graham G. Walmsley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graham G. Walmsley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graham G. Walmsley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graham G. Walmsley

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graham G. Walmsley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graham G. Walmsley. The network helps show where Graham G. Walmsley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graham G. Walmsley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graham G. Walmsley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graham G. Walmsley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graham G. Walmsley. Graham G. Walmsley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

16 of 16 papers shown

Hu, Michael S., Tripp Leavitt, Julia T. Garcia, et al.. (2018). Abstract 43: Embryonic Expression of Prrx1 Identifies the Fibroblast Responsible for Scarring in the Mouse Ventral Dermis. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. 6(4S). 34–34. 3 indexed citations

Hu, Michael S., Justin Y. Cheng, Mimi R. Borrelli, et al.. (2017). An Improved Humanized Mouse Model for Excisional Wound Healing Using Double Transgenic Mice. Advances in Wound Care. 7(1). 11–17. 11 indexed citations

Ko, Sae Hee, Allison Nauta, Shane D. Morrison, et al.. (2017). PHD-2 Suppression in Mesenchymal Stromal Cells Enhances Wound Healing. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 141(1). 55e–67e. 15 indexed citations

Hu, Michael S., Graham G. Walmsley, Leandra A. Barnes, et al.. (2017). Delivery of monocyte lineage cells in a biomimetic scaffold enhances tissue repair. JCI Insight. 2(19). 57 indexed citations

Duscher, Dominik, Anna Luan, Robert C. Rennert, et al.. (2016). Suction assisted liposuction does not impair the regenerative potential of adipose derived stem cells. Journal of Translational Medicine. 14(1). 126–126. 28 indexed citations

Walmsley, Graham G., Ryan C. Ransom, Elizabeth R. Zielins, et al.. (2016). Stem Cells in Bone Regeneration. Stem Cell Reviews and Reports. 12(5). 524–529. 128 indexed citations

Hu, Michael S., Graham G. Walmsley, Ulrike Litzenburger, et al.. (2016). Abstract: ATAC-seq Reveals Heterogeneity of Fibroblasts During Transition from Scarless Fetal to Scar-Forming Adult Wound Repair. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open. 4(9S). 128–129. 1 indexed citations

Hu, Michael S., Graham G. Walmsley, Zeshaan N. Maan, et al.. (2016). Engrailed-1 Identifies the Fibroblast Lineage Responsible for the Transition from Fetal Scarless to Adult Scarring Cutaneous Wound Repair. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 223(4). S96–S97. 1 indexed citations

Zielins, Elizabeth R., Elizabeth A. Brett, Anna Luan, et al.. (2015). Emerging drugs for the treatment of wound healing. Expert Opinion on Emerging Drugs. 20(2). 235–246. 41 indexed citations

10.

Hu, Michael S., Tripp Leavitt, Samir Malhotra, et al.. (2015). Stem Cell-Based Therapeutics to Improve Wound Healing. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2015. 1–7. 35 indexed citations

11.

Duscher, Dominik, David Atashroo, Zeshaan N. Maan, et al.. (2015). Ultrasound-Assisted Liposuction Does Not Compromise the Regenerative Potential of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells. Stem Cells Translational Medicine. 5(2). 248–257. 34 indexed citations

12.

Hu, Michael S., Zeshaan N. Maan, Jen‐Chieh Wu, et al.. (2014). Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Repair in Wound Healing. Annals of Biomedical Engineering. 42(7). 1494–1507. 138 indexed citations

13.

Walmsley, Graham G., Jeong S. Hyun, Adrian McArdle, et al.. (2014). Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells in Regenerative Medicine and Disease Modeling. Current Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 9(2). 73–81. 10 indexed citations

14.

Morrison, Shane D., Michael S. Hu, Shuli Li, et al.. (2014). Epidermal or Dermal Specific Knockout of PHD-2 Enhances Wound Healing and Minimizes Ischemic Injury. PLoS ONE. 9(4). e93373–e93373. 27 indexed citations

15.

Duscher, Dominik, Robert C. Rennert, Michael Januszyk, et al.. (2014). Aging disrupts cell subpopulation dynamics and diminishes the function of mesenchymal stem cells. Scientific Reports. 4(1). 7144–7144. 122 indexed citations

16.

Hyun, Jeong S., Monica Grova, Hossein Nejadnik, et al.. (2013). Enhancing In Vivo Survival of Adipose-Derived Stromal Cells Through Bcl-2 Overexpression Using a Minicircle Vector. Stem Cells Translational Medicine. 2(9). 690–702. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact