Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
PROCEDURES FOR COMPARING AND COMBINING RADIOCARBON AGE DETERMINATIONS: A CRITIQUE
1978812 citationsGraeme Ward, Susan R. WilsonArchaeometryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Graeme Ward's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graeme Ward with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graeme Ward more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graeme Ward. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graeme Ward. The network helps show where Graeme Ward may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graeme Ward
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graeme Ward.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graeme Ward based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Graeme Ward. Graeme Ward is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Ward, Graeme. (2011). THE ROLE OF AIATSIS IN RESEARCH AND PROTECTION OF AUSTRALIAN ROCK ART. 28(1). 7.4 indexed citations
3.
Ward, Graeme, et al.. (2010). Rock Paintings near Wadeye, Northern Territory: Site Management and Educational Aspects of Research and Tourism. 27(2). 229–237.4 indexed citations
4.
Watchman, Alan, et al.. (2010). DATING OF ROCK PAINTINGS IN THE WADEYE- FITZMAURICE REGION, NORTHERN TERRITORY. 27(2). 223–228.3 indexed citations
5.
Bedford, Stuart, William R. Dickinson, Roger C. Green, & Graeme Ward. (2009). Detritus of Empire: Seventeenth Century Spanish Pottery from Taumako, Southeast Solomon Islands, and Mota, Northern Vanuatu. Journal of the Polynesian Society. 118(1). 69–89.9 indexed citations
6.
Ward, Graeme, et al.. (2008). Port Keats Painting: Revolution and Continuity. Australian aboriginal studies. 2008(1). 39.2 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Claire & Graeme Ward. (2000). Globalisation, Decolonisation and Indigenous Australia. Australian aboriginal studies. 3.2 indexed citations
8.
Ward, Graeme. (1994). On the use of radiometric determinations to 'date' archaeological events. Australian aboriginal studies. 106.4 indexed citations
9.
Ward, Graeme. (1993). Symposium H: Management of rock imagery. Australian aboriginal studies. 84.1 indexed citations
10.
Ward, Graeme. (1992). Support for conservation of rock imagery in Australia: results of the second two years of the Institute's Rock Art protection program. Australian aboriginal studies. 35.2 indexed citations
11.
Ward, Graeme, et al.. (1989). Archaeology of an Aboriginal historic site: Recent research at the collarenebri aboriginal cemetary. Australian aboriginal studies. 62.3 indexed citations
12.
Ward, Graeme, et al.. (1989). Conserving Australian rock art : a manual for site managers.7 indexed citations
13.
Ward, Graeme. (1985). The federal Aboriginal 'Heritage Act' and archaeology. Australian aboriginal studies. 47.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.