Gourab Chatterjee

615 citations
43 papers · 443 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Gourab Chatterjee

40 papers receiving 429 citations

Peers

Gourab Chatterjee
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 277
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 270
  • Mechanics of Materials 192
  • Structural Biology 10
  • Geophysics 69
Replace O. Renner with:
O. Renner Czechia
P. Straka Czechia
R. W. Lee United States
E. V. Marley United States
J. Nejdl Czechia
M. P. Hill United Kingdom
S. Bagchi India
Y. Yin China
P. Velarde Spain
J. Emig United States
Gourab Chatterjee relative to O. Renner Czechia O. Renner's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×13.3×
O. Renner · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gourab Chatterjee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gourab Chatterjee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gourab Chatterjee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gourab Chatterjee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gourab Chatterjee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gourab Chatterjee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gourab Chatterjee. The network helps show where Gourab Chatterjee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gourab Chatterjee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gourab Chatterjee Line = papers co-authored together Gourab Chatterjee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201244
2 201742
3 201733
4 201533
5 201527
6 201523
7 201319
8 202318
9 201413
10 196712
11 201711
12 201711
13 202010
14 201210
15 201210
16 201810
17 20189
18 20178
19 19908
20 20137

About Gourab Chatterjee

Gourab Chatterjee is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mechanics of Materials, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computational Mechanics, having authored 43 papers that have together received 443 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications (25 papers), Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (23 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (14 papers), High-pressure geophysics and materials (6 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (6 papers), Solid State Laser Technologies (5 papers), Ion-surface interactions and analysis (4 papers) and Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (277 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (270 citations), Mechanics of Materials (192 citations), Structural Biology (10 citations) and Geophysics (69 citations). Gourab Chatterjee has collaborated with scholars based in India, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include G. Ravindra Kumar, Amit D. Lad, Prashant Kumar Singh, J. Pasley, Axel Ruehl, Saima Ahmed, R. J. Dwayne Miller, Ingmar Hartl, Anil K. Sood and S. Mondal. Their work appears in journals such as Physics of Plasmas, Scientific Reports, Optics Express, Physical Review Letters and Optics Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact