Gordon Muir Giles

1.2k total citations
69 papers, 823 citations indexed

About

Gordon Muir Giles is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Gordon Muir Giles has authored 69 papers receiving a total of 823 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 27 papers in Epidemiology, 15 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 13 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Gordon Muir Giles's work include Traumatic Brain Injury Research (25 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (9 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (9 papers). Gordon Muir Giles is often cited by papers focused on Traumatic Brain Injury Research (25 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (9 papers) and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (9 papers). Gordon Muir Giles collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Gordon Muir Giles's co-authors include Dorothy Farrar Edwards, M. Tracy Morrison, Carolyn Baum, Timothy Wolf, David Manchester, Mary E. Allen, Doreen M. Baxter, Elizabeth R. Skidmore, Paul W. Burgess and Natalie E. Leland and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Alzheimer s & Dementia and Disability and Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

Gordon Muir Giles

64 papers receiving 733 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gordon Muir Giles United States 18 352 332 184 154 153 69 823
Lance E. Trexler United States 12 265 0.8× 500 1.5× 171 0.9× 123 0.8× 130 0.8× 25 868
Emmah Doig Australia 17 298 0.8× 503 1.5× 232 1.3× 150 1.0× 46 0.3× 61 864
Catherine Wiseman‐Hakes Canada 17 163 0.5× 627 1.9× 61 0.3× 116 0.8× 264 1.7× 44 1.1k
Emily Nalder Canada 15 227 0.6× 299 0.9× 85 0.5× 234 1.5× 89 0.6× 71 879
Pamela S. Klonoff United States 17 204 0.6× 784 2.4× 128 0.7× 169 1.1× 127 0.8× 31 1.0k
Caisa Hofgren Sweden 15 153 0.4× 206 0.6× 126 0.7× 108 0.7× 53 0.3× 23 747
Felicity Bright New Zealand 15 186 0.5× 149 0.4× 283 1.5× 165 1.1× 142 0.9× 36 844
Allison Clark United States 19 198 0.6× 790 2.4× 99 0.5× 283 1.8× 124 0.8× 33 1.1k
Lenore Hawley United States 10 121 0.3× 398 1.2× 55 0.3× 108 0.7× 92 0.6× 21 522
Catherine Verrier Piersol United States 19 669 1.9× 128 0.4× 86 0.5× 193 1.3× 60 0.4× 65 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Gordon Muir Giles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gordon Muir Giles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gordon Muir Giles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gordon Muir Giles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gordon Muir Giles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gordon Muir Giles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gordon Muir Giles. The network helps show where Gordon Muir Giles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gordon Muir Giles

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gordon Muir Giles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gordon Muir Giles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gordon Muir Giles. Gordon Muir Giles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Giles, Gordon Muir, et al.. (2025). Functional cognitive performance augments cognitive screening data in older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 17. 1535146–1535146.
2.
Pop‐Vicas, Aurora, et al.. (2024). The Functional Consequences of Long COVID Need to Be Addressed by Occupational Therapists. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 78(5). 1 indexed citations
4.
Giles, Gordon Muir, et al.. (2021). How Well Does the Brief Interview for Mental Status Identify Risk for Cognition Mediated Functional Impairment in a Community Sample?. Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation. 3(1). 100102–100102. 5 indexed citations
5.
Giles, Gordon Muir, et al.. (2020). Can Brief Cognitive or Medication Management Tasks Identify the Potential for Dependence in Instrumental Activities of Daily Living?. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience. 12. 33–33. 9 indexed citations
6.
Giles, Gordon Muir, et al.. (2018). The interrelationship of functional skills in individuals living in the community, following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury. 33(2). 129–136. 13 indexed citations
7.
Giles, Gordon Muir, et al.. (2018). The construct validity of a new screening measure of functional cognitive ability: The menu task. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 30(5). 961–972. 12 indexed citations
8.
Giles, Gordon Muir, et al.. (2016). Goals and Expectations of Continuation High School Students Transitioning to Postsecondary Education. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(4). 3 indexed citations
9.
Giles, Gordon Muir, et al.. (2014). Revisiting the neurofunctional approach: Conceptualizing the core components for the rehabilitation of everyday living skills. Brain Injury. 28(13-14). 1646–1656. 18 indexed citations
10.
Giles, Gordon Muir, et al.. (2014). Brain Injury Rehabilitation: A neurofunctional approach. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 4 indexed citations
11.
Giles, Gordon Muir, Karen Scott, & David Manchester. (2013). Staff-reported antecedents to aggression in a post-acute brain injury treatment programme: What are they and what implications do they have for treatment?. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 23(5). 732–754. 11 indexed citations
12.
Giles, Gordon Muir, et al.. (2012). Occupational Therapists’ and Teachers’ Differing Beliefs About How They Can Assist Continuation High School Students’ Transition to Postsecondary Education. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health. 28(1). 88–105. 4 indexed citations
13.
Giles, Gordon Muir. (2010). Cognitive Versus Functional Approaches to Rehabilitation After Traumatic Brain Injury: Commentary on a Randomized Controlled Trial. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 64(1). 182–185. 14 indexed citations
15.
Giles, Gordon Muir, et al.. (2005). Twenty-month effectiveness of a non-aversive, long-term, low-cost programme for persons with persisting neurobehavioural disability. Brain Injury. 19(10). 753–764. 16 indexed citations
16.
Giles, Gordon Muir & John H. Morgan. (1990). Self-Instruction in the Training of Functional Skills: A Single Case Study. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 53(8). 314–316. 2 indexed citations
17.
Giles, Gordon Muir. (1989). Demonstrating the Effectiveness of Occupational Therapy After Severe Brain Trauma. American Journal of Occupational Therapy. 43(9). 613–615. 2 indexed citations
18.
Giles, Gordon Muir, et al.. (1988). The behavioural treatment of verbal interaction skills following severe head injury: A single case study. Brain Injury. 2(1). 75–79. 25 indexed citations
19.
Giles, Gordon Muir & Mary E. Allen. (1986). Occupational Therapy in the Rehabilitation of the Patient with Anorexia Nervosa. Occupational Therapy in Mental Health. 6(1). 47–66. 8 indexed citations
20.
Giles, Gordon Muir, et al.. (1984). A Guide to Relevant Sections of the Mental Health Act 1983. British Journal of Occupational Therapy. 47(1). 4–6. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026