G.L. Phipps

425 total citations
7 papers, 349 citations indexed

About

G.L. Phipps is a scholar working on Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, G.L. Phipps has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 349 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, 3 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation and 2 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in G.L. Phipps's work include Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (7 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (2 papers) and Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (2 papers). G.L. Phipps is often cited by papers focused on Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (7 papers), Fish Ecology and Management Studies (2 papers) and Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (2 papers). G.L. Phipps collaborates with scholars based in United States. G.L. Phipps's co-authors include Gerald T. Ankley, Vincent R. Mattson, Robert A. Hoke, E.N. Leonard, D.A. Benoit, Patricia A. Kosian, C.E. Stephan, Quentin H. Pickering, Arthur L. Buikema and Corlis W. West and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety and Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology.

In The Last Decade

G.L. Phipps

7 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
G.L. Phipps United States	6	276	193	80	47	41	7	349
Marcel Tonkes Netherlands	8	274 1.0×	200 1.0×	65 0.8×	50 1.1×	53 1.3×	9	365
Geoffrey Mance United Kingdom	6	228 0.8×	162 0.8×	73 0.9×	87 1.9×	54 1.3×	10	407
Carolyn D. Rowland United States	7	183 0.7×	146 0.8×	50 0.6×	50 1.1×	43 1.0×	10	266
Marc Baillieul Belgium	10	265 1.0×	145 0.8×	102 1.3×	51 1.1×	77 1.9×	11	379
Daniel F. Krawczyk United States	11	385 1.4×	242 1.3×	106 1.3×	72 1.5×	81 2.0×	17	471
E.N. Leonard United States	7	324 1.2×	204 1.1×	60 0.8×	70 1.5×	69 1.7×	9	449
P. Hennigar Canada	8	267 1.0×	168 0.9×	51 0.6×	27 0.6×	27 0.7×	9	356
Lien T. H. Nguyen Belgium	10	242 0.9×	238 1.2×	59 0.7×	55 1.2×	83 2.0×	13	355
V. Talbot Australia	15	293 1.1×	278 1.4×	75 0.9×	49 1.0×	27 0.7×	23	480
Timothy D. Dawson United States	9	280 1.0×	182 0.9×	66 0.8×	27 0.6×	41 1.0×	12	386

Countries citing papers authored by G.L. Phipps

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.L. Phipps's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.L. Phipps with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.L. Phipps more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.L. Phipps

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.L. Phipps. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.L. Phipps. The network helps show where G.L. Phipps may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G.L. Phipps

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G.L. Phipps. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G.L. Phipps based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G.L. Phipps. G.L. Phipps is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Phipps, G.L., Vincent R. Mattson, & Gerald T. Ankley. (1995). Relative sensitivity of three freshwater benthic macroinvertebrates to ten contaminants. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 28(3). 129 indexed citations

2.

West, Corlis W., et al.. (1994). Sediment Core versus Grab Samples: Evaluation of Contamination and Toxicity at a DDT-Contaminated Site. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 28(2). 208–220. 14 indexed citations

3.

Hoke, Robert A., et al.. (1994). Evaluation of equilibrium partitioning theory for predicting acute toxicity of field-collected sediments contaminated with DDT, DDE and DDD to the amphipodHyalella azteca. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry. 13(1). 157–166. 55 indexed citations

4.

Benoit, D.A., et al.. (1993). Development and evaluation of test methods for benthic invertebrates and sediments: Effects of flow rate and feeding on water quality and exposure conditions. Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology. 25(1). 102 indexed citations

5.

Phipps, G.L., et al.. (1984). Effects of pollution on freshwater organisms. Journal of Water Pollution Control Federation. 56(6). 539–572. 40 indexed citations

6.

Pickering, Quentin H., et al.. (1983). Effects of pollution on freshwater fish and amphibians. 14 Suppl 2. 17–25. 6 indexed citations

7.

Carlson, Anthony R., et al.. (1982). Cadmium and endrin toxicity to fish in waters containing mineral fibers. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). 29(3). 147–53. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact