G.J. Wozniak

1.9k total citations
59 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

G.J. Wozniak is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Radiation and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. According to data from OpenAlex, G.J. Wozniak has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 28 papers in Radiation and 15 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. Recurrent topics in G.J. Wozniak's work include Nuclear physics research studies (37 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (22 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (13 papers). G.J. Wozniak is often cited by papers focused on Nuclear physics research studies (37 papers), Nuclear Physics and Applications (22 papers) and Astronomical and nuclear sciences (13 papers). G.J. Wozniak collaborates with scholars based in United States, Italy and Brazil. G.J. Wozniak's co-authors include L.G. Moretto, L. G. Moretto, M. A. McMahan, L. Phair, D. R. Bowman, R. J. McDonald, L. G. Sobotka, K. Jing, N. Colonna and R. J. Charity and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Reports and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

G.J. Wozniak

56 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G.J. Wozniak United States 21 1.1k 453 409 277 109 59 1.3k
J. B. Natowitz United States 26 1.2k 1.0× 484 1.1× 403 1.0× 307 1.1× 83 0.8× 64 1.3k
W. G. Gong United States 23 1.3k 1.1× 374 0.8× 458 1.1× 352 1.3× 94 0.9× 63 1.5k
M. F. Rivet France 24 1.3k 1.2× 614 1.4× 412 1.0× 299 1.1× 81 0.7× 83 1.4k
E. Norbeck United States 21 1.2k 1.1× 485 1.1× 396 1.0× 235 0.8× 65 0.6× 76 1.4k
H. Breuer United States 24 1.5k 1.4× 669 1.5× 579 1.4× 336 1.2× 106 1.0× 79 1.7k
Christian Ngô France 22 1.2k 1.1× 591 1.3× 302 0.7× 213 0.8× 150 1.4× 68 1.4k
I. Iori Italy 19 840 0.8× 341 0.8× 378 0.9× 238 0.9× 79 0.7× 74 1.0k
J. Tõke United States 22 1.7k 1.5× 649 1.4× 562 1.4× 454 1.6× 104 1.0× 75 1.8k
J. R. Birkelund United States 21 1.4k 1.3× 702 1.5× 451 1.1× 281 1.0× 109 1.0× 40 1.5k
D. Guerreau France 25 1.5k 1.3× 615 1.4× 639 1.6× 312 1.1× 74 0.7× 66 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by G.J. Wozniak

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.J. Wozniak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.J. Wozniak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.J. Wozniak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.J. Wozniak

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.J. Wozniak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.J. Wozniak. The network helps show where G.J. Wozniak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G.J. Wozniak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G.J. Wozniak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G.J. Wozniak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G.J. Wozniak. G.J. Wozniak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wozniak, G.J.. (2010). Frac Sleeves: Is Milling Them Out Worth the Trouble?. 20 indexed citations
2.
Moretto, L.G., et al.. (2002). Theoretical approaches and experimental evidence for liquid-vapor phase transitions in nuclei. AIP conference proceedings. 610. 182–196. 1 indexed citations
3.
Fan, Tieshuan, K. Jing, L. Phair, et al.. (2000). Excitation functions and mass asymmetric fission barriers for compound nuclei Se. Nuclear Physics A. 679(2). 121–146. 17 indexed citations
4.
Moretto, L.G., et al.. (2000). Comment on “Experimental Evidence for Dynamical Decay of Finite Nuclear Matter”. Physical Review Letters. 85(12). 2645–2645. 3 indexed citations
5.
Jing, K., et al.. (1996). Low-Z impurities of carbon foils. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms. 108(1-2). 159–162. 3 indexed citations
6.
Moretto, L.G., K. Jing, & G.J. Wozniak. (1995). Transition State Rates and Complex Fragment Decay Widths. Physical Review Letters. 74(18). 3557–3560. 17 indexed citations
7.
Moretto, L. G., L. Phair, K. Tso, et al.. (1995). Are Multifragment Emission Probabilities Reducible to an Elementary Binary Emission Probability. Physical Review Letters. 74(9). 1530–1533. 31 indexed citations
8.
Justice, M., Y. Blumenfeld, N. Colonna, et al.. (1994). Electromagnetic dissociation ofU238at 120 MeV/nucleon. Physical Review C. 49(1). R5–R9. 14 indexed citations
9.
Phair, L., D. R. Bowman, N. Carlin, et al.. (1993). Azimuthal correlations as a test for centrality in heavy-ion collisions. Nuclear Physics A. 564(3). 453–472. 15 indexed citations
10.
Colonna, N., G.J. Wozniak, W. Skulski, et al.. (1992). Calibration of the response function of CsI(Tl) scintillators to intermediate-energy heavy ions. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 321(3). 529–534. 33 indexed citations
11.
Blumenfeld, Y., D. R. Bowman, N. Colonna, et al.. (1991). Mass asymmetric fission barriers for 75Br. Nuclear Physics A. 534(2). 403–428. 13 indexed citations
12.
Bowman, D. R., G.J. Wozniak, R. J. Charity, et al.. (1989). Complex fragments from excited actinide nuclei. A new test of the finite range model. Physics Letters B. 218(4). 427–430. 10 indexed citations
13.
Pantaleo, A., L. Fiore, G. Guarino, et al.. (1988). A novel approach to the measurement of the neutron multiplicity associated with reverse kinematics heavy ion reactions. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A Accelerators Spectrometers Detectors and Associated Equipment. 269(3). 580–584. 1 indexed citations
14.
Sobotka, L. G., G.J. Wozniak, R. J. McDonald, et al.. (1986). Excitation energy division in the first 160 MeV of total kinetic energy loss for the reaction 684 MeV 80Kr+174Yb. Physics Letters B. 175(1). 27–31. 17 indexed citations
15.
Charity, R. J., M. A. McMahan, D. R. Bowman, et al.. (1986). Characterization of Hot Compound Nuclei from Binary Decay into Complex Fragments. Physical Review Letters. 56(13). 1354–1357. 40 indexed citations
16.
Draper, J. E., J.O. Newton, L. G. Sobotka, et al.. (1982). Dependence of the Giant Dipole Strength Function on Excitation Energy. Physical Review Letters. 49(7). 434–437. 57 indexed citations
17.
Schmitt, R., et al.. (1981). Fast-Particle Emission in the Deep-Inelastic Reaction Cu+Ne20at 12.6 MeV/nucleon. Physical Review Letters. 46(8). 522–525. 21 indexed citations
18.
Wozniak, G.J., R. J. McDonald, Alberto Pacheco, et al.. (1980). Rise and Fall of the Spin Alignment in Deep-Inelastic Reactions. Physical Review Letters. 45(13). 1081–1084. 18 indexed citations
19.
Jahn, R., D. P. Stahel, G.J. Wozniak, R.J. de Meijer, & Joseph Cerny. (1978). Survey of the (α,He2) reaction on1p- and2s1d-shell nuclei. Physical Review C. 18(1). 9–22. 35 indexed citations
20.
Wozniak, G.J., et al.. (1975). ($sup 9$Be, $sup 8$B) reaction and the unbound nuclide $sup 10$Li. Physics Letters B.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026