G.J. Williams

555 total citations
13 papers, 283 citations indexed

About

G.J. Williams is a scholar working on Infectious Diseases, Ophthalmology and Orthodontics. According to data from OpenAlex, G.J. Williams has authored 13 papers receiving a total of 283 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Infectious Diseases, 4 papers in Ophthalmology and 2 papers in Orthodontics. Recurrent topics in G.J. Williams's work include Infection Control in Healthcare (3 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (3 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (2 papers). G.J. Williams is often cited by papers focused on Infection Control in Healthcare (3 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (3 papers) and Retinal and Optic Conditions (2 papers). G.J. Williams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Italy. G.J. Williams's co-authors include Jean‐Yves Maillard, S.P. Denyer, I.K. Hosein, D.W. Hill, D.J. Stickler, M Gavin, John V. Forrester, Brian Jones, David Lockington and John A. Olson and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Urology, British Journal of Ophthalmology and Journal of Hospital Infection.

In The Last Decade

G.J. Williams

13 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G.J. Williams United Kingdom 8 73 73 54 52 37 13 283
Michiko Kaneko Japan 10 34 0.5× 49 0.7× 3 0.1× 27 0.5× 32 263
Chuhan Wang China 9 21 0.3× 57 0.8× 26 0.5× 28 251
Camilo Brandão‐de‐Resende Brazil 11 22 0.3× 8 0.1× 8 0.1× 42 0.8× 22 192
Laura Pierce United States 9 139 1.9× 22 0.3× 2 0.0× 14 338
Kabita Pandey United States 9 138 1.9× 7 0.1× 3 0.1× 21 287
Lairun Jin China 8 78 1.1× 30 0.4× 1 0.0× 20 170
Susan A. Doyle United States 9 67 0.9× 5 0.1× 2 0.0× 10 357
Sandra M. Rua Ventura Portugal 10 32 0.4× 55 0.8× 1 0.0× 25 244
Francesca Volpato Italy 10 25 0.3× 13 0.2× 36 335
Xiaofang Zhou China 8 64 0.9× 27 0.5× 16 173

Countries citing papers authored by G.J. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.J. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.J. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.J. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.J. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.J. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.J. Williams. The network helps show where G.J. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G.J. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G.J. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G.J. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G.J. Williams. G.J. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
1.
Jones, Brian, et al.. (2018). Fundoscopy screening for intraocular candida in patients with positive blood cultures—is it justified?. Eye. 32(11). 1697–1702. 16 indexed citations
2.
Klistorner, Alexander, Yi Chai, Letizia Leocani, et al.. (2018). Assessment of Opicinumab in Acute Optic Neuritis Using Multifocal Visual Evoked Potential. CNS Drugs. 32(12). 1159–1171. 36 indexed citations
3.
Chadha, Vikas, et al.. (2011). Presumed occult globe rupture resulting in sympathetic ophthalmia. Journal of Ophthalmic Inflammation and Infection. 2(3). 137–140. 3 indexed citations
5.
Williams, G.J., et al.. (2009). Evaluation of alcohol wipes used during aseptic manufacturing. Letters in Applied Microbiology. 48(5). 648–651. 20 indexed citations
6.
Denyer, S.P., et al.. (2009). Evaluation of the bactericidal efficacy of three different alcohol hand rubs against 57 clinical isolates of S. aureus. Journal of Hospital Infection. 72(4). 319–325. 16 indexed citations
7.
Williams, G.J., S.P. Denyer, I.K. Hosein, D.W. Hill, & Jean‐Yves Maillard. (2007). The development of a new three-step protocol to determine the efficacy of disinfectant wipes on surfaces contaminated with Staphylococcus aureus. Journal of Hospital Infection. 67(4). 329–335. 41 indexed citations
8.
Williams, G.J. & D.J. Stickler. (2007). Some Observations on the Diffusion of Antimicrobial Agents Through the Retention Balloons of Foley Catheters. The Journal of Urology. 178(2). 697–701. 11 indexed citations
9.
Williams, G.J., et al.. (2006). The prevalence of sight-threatening uveitis in Scotland. British Journal of Ophthalmology. 91(1). 33–36. 33 indexed citations
10.
Williams, G.J., Sarah H. Wild, & J.F. Bates. (1984). A study of some factors affecting the surface properties of dental stone. BDJ. 156(2). 46–53. 3 indexed citations
11.
Williams, G.J., et al.. (1983). The effect of surface treatment of dental stone with resins.. PubMed. 7(1). 41–5. 3 indexed citations
12.
Williams, G.J. & D.H. Edmunds. (1981). Crown and bridge technology in the United Kingdom. A survey of dental laboratories. BDJ. 150(8). 215–217. 2 indexed citations
13.
Williams, G.J.. (1978). WORLDS, TIMES AND SELVES. Philosophical Books. 19(2). 80–81. 96 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026