Giselle M. Darling

443 total citations
7 papers, 346 citations indexed

About

Giselle M. Darling is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Genetics and Clinical Biochemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Giselle M. Darling has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 346 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 3 papers in Genetics and 1 paper in Clinical Biochemistry. Recurrent topics in Giselle M. Darling's work include Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (6 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (3 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers). Giselle M. Darling is often cited by papers focused on Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments (6 papers), Estrogen and related hormone effects (3 papers) and Hormonal and reproductive studies (2 papers). Giselle M. Darling collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Ireland. Giselle M. Darling's co-authors include Philip McCloud, Susan R. Davis, Jennifer Johns, Edith Weisberg, Rosemary A. Ayton, Emily Farrell, Sharron O’Neill, Paul M. Mathias, E. R. Naughten and M O'Regan and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Maturitas and Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey.

In The Last Decade

Giselle M. Darling

7 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Giselle M. Darling Australia 6 239 175 71 53 50 7 346
Purvis L. Martin United States 11 241 1.0× 248 1.4× 84 1.2× 38 0.7× 18 0.4× 23 580
Irwin J. Kerber United States 8 122 0.5× 99 0.6× 18 0.3× 43 0.8× 22 0.4× 12 406
Chang Hoon Yim South Korea 11 109 0.5× 38 0.2× 41 0.6× 68 1.3× 30 0.6× 29 318
Rosaria Certo Italy 8 192 0.8× 69 0.4× 75 1.1× 24 0.5× 30 0.6× 17 309
M.M. Jones United Kingdom 9 123 0.5× 106 0.6× 48 0.7× 21 0.4× 17 0.3× 11 325
Daniel M. Duffy United States 6 147 0.6× 96 0.5× 42 0.6× 124 2.3× 6 0.1× 8 356
Leslie Rees United Kingdom 9 94 0.4× 102 0.6× 15 0.2× 104 2.0× 38 0.8× 12 401
Celestino Neves Portugal 9 252 1.1× 76 0.4× 31 0.4× 92 1.7× 13 0.3× 39 381
Sophia Sakka Greece 13 43 0.2× 72 0.4× 23 0.3× 43 0.8× 16 0.3× 34 448
Anna De Matteis Italy 7 107 0.4× 30 0.2× 27 0.4× 124 2.3× 79 1.6× 13 449

Countries citing papers authored by Giselle M. Darling

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Giselle M. Darling's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giselle M. Darling with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giselle M. Darling more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Giselle M. Darling

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giselle M. Darling. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giselle M. Darling. The network helps show where Giselle M. Darling may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Giselle M. Darling

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Giselle M. Darling. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Giselle M. Darling based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Giselle M. Darling. Giselle M. Darling is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
1.
Weisberg, Edith, et al.. (2005). Endometrial and vaginal effects of low-dose estradiol delivered by vaginal ring or vaginal tablet. Climacteric. 8(1). 83–93. 120 indexed citations
2.
Darling, Giselle M., Jennifer Johns, Philip McCloud, & Susan R. Davis. (1999). Concurrent use of simvastatin and estrogen-progestin therapy compared with each therapy alone for hypercholesterolemia in postmenopausal women. Climacteric. 2(3). 181–188. 15 indexed citations
3.
Darling, Giselle M., Jennifer Johns, Philip McCloud, & Susan R. Davis. (1998). Estrogen and Progestin Compared With Simvastatin for Hypercholesterolemia in Postmenopausal Women. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 53(2). 92–94. 20 indexed citations
4.
Darling, Giselle M., Jennifer Johns, Philip McCloud, & Susan R. Davis. (1997). Estrogen and Progestin Compared with Simvastatin for Hypercholesterolemia in Postmenopausal Women. New England Journal of Medicine. 337(9). 595–601. 153 indexed citations
5.
Ayton, Rosemary A., Giselle M. Darling, Alice L. Murkies, et al.. (1996). A Comparative Study of Safety and Efficacy of Continuous Low Dose Oestradiol Released From a Vaginal Ring Compared With Conjugated Equine Oestrogen Vaginal Cream in the Treatment of Postmenopausal Urogenital Atrophy. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 51(10). 612–614. 1 indexed citations
6.
Fraser, Ian S., Rosemary A. Ayton, Emily Farrell, et al.. (1995). A multicentre Australian trial of low dose estradiol therapy for symptoms of vaginal atrophy using a vaginal ring as delivery system. Maturitas. 22. S41–S41. 10 indexed citations
7.
Darling, Giselle M., Paul M. Mathias, M O'Regan, & E. R. Naughten. (1991). Serum selenium levels in individuals on PKU diets. Journal of Inherited Metabolic Disease. 15(5). 769–773. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026