Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Optical coherence tomography angiography
20171.2k citationsSrinivas R. Sadda, Giovanni Staurenghi et al.profile →
Countries citing papers authored by Giovanni Staurenghi
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Giovanni Staurenghi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giovanni Staurenghi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giovanni Staurenghi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Giovanni Staurenghi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giovanni Staurenghi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giovanni Staurenghi. The network helps show where Giovanni Staurenghi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Giovanni Staurenghi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Giovanni Staurenghi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Giovanni Staurenghi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Giovanni Staurenghi. Giovanni Staurenghi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Corvi, Federico, Marco Pellegrini, Giovanni Staurenghi, et al.. (2020). Nodular Epiretinal Gliosis in the Fovea. Ophthalmology Retina. 5(6). 594–596.1 indexed citations
Schumann, Ricarda G., et al.. (2017). Progression of Lamellar Hole-Associated Epiretinal Proliferation and Retinal Changes in Lamellar Macular Holes during Long Time Follow-Up. European Journal of Ophthalmology.1 indexed citations
11.
Corvi, Federico, Marco Pellegrini, Emil Anthony T. Say, Carol L. Shields, & Giovanni Staurenghi. (2017). Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Features of Choroidal Neovascularization Associated with Choroidal Nevus. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 58(8). 1854–1854.1 indexed citations
Gil, João, João Pedro Marques, Ruth Hogg, et al.. (2016). Clinical features and long-term progression of reticular pseudodrusen in age-related macular degeneration: Findings from a multi-center cohort. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 57(12). 4963–4963.2 indexed citations
15.
Bottoni, Ferdinando, et al.. (2010). Autofluorescence, Sd-oct and Microperimetric Study of the Macula Following 360° Full Translocation Surgery. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 51(13). 1747–1747.1 indexed citations
16.
Pellegrini, Marco, et al.. (2008). Corneal Confocal Microscopy: Relationship With Diabetic Neuropathy Evaluated Clinically and Electromyographycally. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 2807–2807.
17.
Mantovani, E., et al.. (2008). Combined Use of Anecortave-PDT for the Treatment of Retinal Angiomatous Proliferation Stage 2-3 in Age-Related Macular Degeneration. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 49(13). 548–548.1 indexed citations
Goger, D G, et al.. (2004). Spatial Distribution of Macular Pigment in Normal Subjects. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 45(13). 1288–1288.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.