Gino Venegas

408 total citations
9 papers, 148 citations indexed

About

Gino Venegas is a scholar working on Oncology, Epidemiology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Gino Venegas has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 148 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Oncology, 6 papers in Epidemiology and 2 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Gino Venegas's work include Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (6 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers). Gino Venegas is often cited by papers focused on Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (6 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (5 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (3 papers). Gino Venegas collaborates with scholars based in United States, Tanzania and Peru. Gino Venegas's co-authors include Nirmala Ramanujam, John W. Schmitt, Jenna L. Mueller, Christopher T. Lam, Guillermo Sapiro, Mercy Asiedu, Alaattin Erkanli, Ernesto Ortiz, Bariki Mchome and Roopa Hariprasad and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology and BMC Women s Health.

In The Last Decade

Gino Venegas

8 papers receiving 145 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gino Venegas United States 4 98 77 49 27 22 9 148
Mercy Asiedu United States 7 127 1.3× 93 1.2× 53 1.1× 38 1.4× 27 1.2× 18 209
Jacob Pfau United States 3 28 0.3× 66 0.9× 90 1.8× 25 0.9× 16 0.7× 4 175
Zhuo Ran Cai United States 7 20 0.2× 71 0.9× 68 1.4× 32 1.2× 7 0.3× 19 228
Tova Rogers United States 5 80 0.8× 26 0.3× 130 2.7× 5 0.2× 20 0.9× 8 155
Debora Smith United States 9 127 1.3× 63 0.8× 36 0.7× 23 0.9× 19 0.9× 16 319
Thomas J. Fuchs United States 5 42 0.4× 47 0.6× 12 0.2× 37 1.4× 5 0.2× 8 137
Alceu Bissoto Brazil 4 22 0.2× 66 0.9× 61 1.2× 20 0.7× 9 0.4× 7 106
Pietro Danna Italy 5 17 0.2× 25 0.3× 22 0.4× 80 3.0× 9 0.4× 7 126
Haiwen Gui United States 6 10 0.1× 67 0.9× 27 0.6× 43 1.6× 9 0.4× 13 211
Charlotte Robinson United Kingdom 6 60 0.6× 13 0.2× 47 1.0× 69 2.6× 24 1.1× 9 144

Countries citing papers authored by Gino Venegas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gino Venegas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gino Venegas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gino Venegas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gino Venegas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gino Venegas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gino Venegas. The network helps show where Gino Venegas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gino Venegas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gino Venegas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gino Venegas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gino Venegas. Gino Venegas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Lemos, Mariantonia, Carolina Espina, Ariadna Feliu, et al.. (2023). Latin America and the Caribbean Code Against Cancer 1st edition: Formative research on the comprehension and persuasiveness of the recommendations by the general population. Cancer Epidemiology. 86. 102456–102456. 2 indexed citations
3.
Benítes-Zapata, Vicente A., Enrique A. Hernández-Bustamante, Juan R. Ulloque‐Badaracco, et al.. (2023). Colposcopy in the Primary Health Care: A Scoping Review. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health. 14. 4277819102–4277819102. 1 indexed citations
4.
Venegas, Gino, et al.. (2021). Factores asociados al resultado citológico positivo en pruebas de Papanicolau en mujeres atendidas en la Liga peruana de lucha contra el cáncer. Revista del Cuerpo Médico Hospital Nacional Almanzor Aguinaga Asenjo. 14(4). 484–490. 1 indexed citations
5.
Alzamora, Maria C., et al.. (2020). Síndrome de teratoma creciente: reporte de caso y revisión de la literatura. Revista Peruana de Ginecología y Obstetricia. 66(4).
6.
Asiedu, Mercy, Jenna L. Mueller, Christopher T. Lam, et al.. (2018). Development of Algorithms for Automated Detection of Cervical Pre-Cancers With a Low-Cost, Point-of-Care, Pocket Colposcope. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 66(8). 2306–2318. 82 indexed citations
7.
Erkanli, Alaattin, et al.. (2018). Portable Pocket colposcopy performs comparably to standard‐of‐care clinical colposcopy using acetic acid and Lugol's iodine as contrast mediators: an investigational study in Peru. BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 125(10). 1321–1329. 31 indexed citations
8.
Mueller, Jenna L., Christopher T. Lam, Marlee Krieger, et al.. (2017). International Image Concordance Study to Compare a Point-of-Care Tampon Colposcope With a Standard-of-Care Colposcope. Journal of Lower Genital Tract Disease. 21(2). 112–119. 26 indexed citations
9.
Mueller, Jenna L., Christopher T. Lam, Mercy Asiedu, et al.. (2017). Clinical evaluation of a portable pocket colposcope for cervical cancer screening in the United States, Perú, and Tanzania. 117–120. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026