Gina Ebanks‐Petrie

919 total citations
20 papers, 650 citations indexed

About

Gina Ebanks‐Petrie is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Gina Ebanks‐Petrie has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 650 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Nature and Landscape Conservation, 14 papers in Ecology and 11 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Gina Ebanks‐Petrie's work include Turtle Biology and Conservation (15 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (9 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (7 papers). Gina Ebanks‐Petrie is often cited by papers focused on Turtle Biology and Conservation (15 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (9 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (7 papers). Gina Ebanks‐Petrie collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Gina Ebanks‐Petrie's co-authors include Brendan J. Godley, Annette C. Broderick, T. J. Austin, JM Blumenthal, Timothy Austin, Graeme C. Hays, Ángela Formia, Peter A. Meylan, Matthew J. Witt and F. Alberto Abreu‐Grobois and has published in prestigious journals such as Conservation Biology, Molecular Ecology and Marine Ecology Progress Series.

In The Last Decade

Gina Ebanks‐Petrie

20 papers receiving 615 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gina Ebanks‐Petrie United Kingdom 14 545 361 339 49 41 20 650
JM Blumenthal United Kingdom 12 750 1.4× 492 1.4× 430 1.3× 51 1.0× 54 1.3× 12 809
Gustave G. Lopez Brazil 15 590 1.1× 294 0.8× 338 1.0× 43 0.9× 81 2.0× 20 658
T. J. Austin United Kingdom 8 388 0.7× 241 0.7× 221 0.7× 29 0.6× 24 0.6× 8 432
Col Limpus Australia 11 401 0.7× 285 0.8× 291 0.9× 52 1.1× 63 1.5× 19 530
Alan F. Rees United Kingdom 14 591 1.1× 298 0.8× 421 1.2× 87 1.8× 112 2.7× 29 658
Raymond A. Saumure United States 7 451 0.8× 324 0.9× 312 0.9× 48 1.0× 41 1.0× 11 566
Kristina Williams United States 16 560 1.0× 378 1.0× 343 1.0× 73 1.5× 69 1.7× 36 689
Erin L. LaCasella United States 11 605 1.1× 334 0.9× 409 1.2× 118 2.4× 100 2.4× 25 735
Peter V. Lindeman United States 17 612 1.1× 402 1.1× 465 1.4× 118 2.4× 56 1.4× 50 676
Francis R. Cook Canada 9 209 0.4× 175 0.5× 192 0.6× 44 0.9× 32 0.8× 92 385

Countries citing papers authored by Gina Ebanks‐Petrie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gina Ebanks‐Petrie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gina Ebanks‐Petrie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gina Ebanks‐Petrie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gina Ebanks‐Petrie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gina Ebanks‐Petrie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gina Ebanks‐Petrie. The network helps show where Gina Ebanks‐Petrie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gina Ebanks‐Petrie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gina Ebanks‐Petrie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gina Ebanks‐Petrie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gina Ebanks‐Petrie. Gina Ebanks‐Petrie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pascalis, Federico De, Stephen C. Votier, John P. Y. Arnould, et al.. (2021). Interspecific and intraspecific foraging differentiation of neighbouring tropical seabirds. Movement Ecology. 9(1). 27–27. 10 indexed citations
2.
Blumenthal, Janice, Timothy Austin, Annette C. Broderick, et al.. (2021). Cayman Islands Sea Turtle Nesting Population Increases Over 22 Years of Monitoring. Frontiers in Marine Science. 8. 13 indexed citations
3.
Stock, Brian C., Scott A. Heppell, Lynn Waterhouse, et al.. (2020). Pulse recruitment and recovery of Cayman Islands Nassau Grouper (Epinephelus striatus) spawning aggregations revealed by in situ length-frequency data. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 78(1). 277–292. 12 indexed citations
4.
Blumenthal, Janice, Annette C. Broderick, Gina Ebanks‐Petrie, et al.. (2019). Founding in action: genetic assessment of new populations from the same reintroduction program. Frontiers in Marine Science. 6. 1 indexed citations
5.
Martín, Clara, Janice Blumenthal, Annette C. Broderick, et al.. (2019). How many came home? Evaluating ex situ conservation of green turtles in the Cayman Islands. Molecular Ecology. 28(7). 1637–1651. 23 indexed citations
6.
Pascalis, Federico De, et al.. (2019). A sex-influenced flexible foraging strategy in a tropical seabird, the magnificent frigatebird. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 611. 203–214. 26 indexed citations
7.
Nuño, Ana, JM Blumenthal, T. J. Austin, et al.. (2017). Understanding implications of consumer behavior for wildlife farming and sustainable wildlife trade. Conservation Biology. 32(2). 390–400. 39 indexed citations
8.
Blumenthal, JM, T. J. Austin, Annette C. Broderick, et al.. (2010). Life in (and out of) the lagoon: fine-scale movements of green turtles tracked using time-depth recorders. Aquatic Biology. 9. 113–121. 22 indexed citations
9.
Blumenthal, JM, T. J. Austin, Annette C. Broderick, et al.. (2009). Ecology of Hawksbill Turtles, Eretmochelys imbricata, on a Western Caribbean Foraging Ground. Chelonian Conservation and Biology. 8(1). 1–10. 68 indexed citations
10.
Blumenthal, JM, F. Alberto Abreu‐Grobois, T. J. Austin, et al.. (2009). Turtle groups or turtle soup: dispersal patterns of hawksbill turtles in the Caribbean. Molecular Ecology. 18(23). 4841–4853. 85 indexed citations
11.
Blumenthal, Janice, et al.. (2008). Harnessing Recreational Divers for the Collection of Sea Turtle Data Around the Cayman Islands. Tourism in Marine Environments. 5(4). 245–257. 18 indexed citations
12.
Blumenthal, JM, T. J. Austin, Annette C. Broderick, et al.. (2008). Diving behavior and movements of juvenile hawksbill turtles Eretmochelys imbricata on a Caribbean coral reef. Coral Reefs. 28(1). 55–65. 60 indexed citations
13.
Blumenthal, JM, et al.. (2007). Monitoring and conservation of critically reduced marine turtle nesting populations: lessons from the Cayman Islands. Animal Conservation. 10(1). 39–47. 27 indexed citations
14.
Blumenthal, JM, et al.. (2006). Traditional Caymanian fishery may impede local marine turtle population recovery. Endangered Species Research. 2. 63–69. 26 indexed citations
15.
Bush, Phillippe G., et al.. (2006). The Nassau Grouper spawning aggregation fishery of the Cayman Islands — an historical and management perspective. AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 6 indexed citations
16.
Blumenthal, JM, et al.. (2006). Satellite tracking highlights the need for international cooperation in marine turtle management. Endangered Species Research. 2. 51–61. 105 indexed citations
17.
Austin, Timothy, et al.. (2005). Some of them came home: the Cayman Turtle Farm headstarting project for the green turtle Chelonia mydas. Oryx. 39(2). 137–148. 57 indexed citations
18.
19.
20.
Bushnell, Peter G. & Gina Ebanks‐Petrie. (1994). The Cayman Islands Nassau Grouper Study: a progress report. AquaDocs (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026