Gina Ebanks‐Petrie

919 citations
20 papers · 650 indexed · h-index 14

Gina Ebanks‐Petrie

20 papers receiving 615 citations

Peers

Gina Ebanks‐Petrie
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 545
  • Ecology 361
  • Global and Planetary Change 339
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 49
  • Parasitology 41
Replace JM Blumenthal with:
JM Blumenthal United Kingdom
Raymond A. Saumure United States
Erin L. LaCasella United States
Gustave G. Lopez Brazil
Luciano S. Soares Brazil
Catalina Monzón‐Argüello Spain
Col Limpus Australia
Kristina Williams United States
T. J. Austin United Kingdom
Peter V. Lindeman United States
Gina Ebanks‐Petrie relative to JM Blumenthal United Kingdom JM Blumenthal's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
JM Blumenthal · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gina Ebanks‐Petrie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gina Ebanks‐Petrie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gina Ebanks‐Petrie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gina Ebanks‐Petrie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gina Ebanks‐Petrie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gina Ebanks‐Petrie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gina Ebanks‐Petrie. The network helps show where Gina Ebanks‐Petrie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gina Ebanks‐Petrie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gina Ebanks‐Petrie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gina Ebanks‐Petrie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gina Ebanks‐Petrie. Gina Ebanks‐Petrie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 10
2 13
3 12
4 1
5 26
6 23
7 39
8 22
9 68
10 85
11 18
12 60
13 27
14
The Nassau Grouper spawning aggregation fishery of the Cayman Islands — an historical and management perspective
6
15 26
16 105
17 57
18 36
19 15
20
The Cayman Islands Nassau Grouper Study: a progress report
1

About Gina Ebanks‐Petrie

Gina Ebanks‐Petrie is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change, having authored 20 papers that have together received 650 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Turtle Biology and Conservation (15 papers), Amphibian and Reptile Biology (9 papers) and Avian ecology and behavior (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (545 citations), Global and Planetary Change (339 citations) and Ecology (361 citations). Gina Ebanks‐Petrie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Annette C. Broderick, Brendan J. Godley, T. J. Austin, JM Blumenthal, Timothy Austin, Graeme C. Hays, Anne B. Meylan, Michael W. Bruford, Peter A. Meylan and F. Alberto Abreu‐Grobois. Their work appears in journals such as Conservation Biology, Molecular Ecology and Marine Ecology Progress Series.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026