Gill Barry

2.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
56 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Gill Barry is a scholar working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Psychiatry and Mental health and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Gill Barry has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, 15 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 12 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Gill Barry's work include Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (21 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (14 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (10 papers). Gill Barry is often cited by papers focused on Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (21 papers), Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (14 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (10 papers). Gill Barry collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Gill Barry's co-authors include Lynn Rochester, Brook Galna, Patrick Olivier, Dan Jackson, Dadirayi Mhiripiri, Alan Godfrey, John C. Mathers, Silvia Del Din, Samuel Stuart and Katherine Baker and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Clinical Infectious Diseases.

In The Last Decade

Gill Barry

51 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

Accuracy of the Microsoft Kinect sensor for measuring mov... 2014 2026 2018 2022 2014 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gill Barry United Kingdom 16 480 338 338 316 221 56 1.5k
Kelly J. Bower Australia 20 722 1.5× 433 1.3× 594 1.8× 777 2.5× 185 0.8× 42 2.0k
Bruno Bonnechère Belgium 20 207 0.4× 181 0.5× 391 1.2× 438 1.4× 172 0.8× 129 1.5k
Benjamin F. Mentiplay Australia 26 779 1.6× 811 2.4× 635 1.9× 723 2.3× 200 0.9× 98 2.9k
Ka‐Chun Siu United States 22 507 1.1× 376 1.1× 364 1.1× 317 1.0× 66 0.3× 92 1.8k
Noël Keijsers Netherlands 21 297 0.6× 493 1.5× 259 0.8× 234 0.7× 332 1.5× 88 1.4k
Sheryl Flynn United States 14 485 1.0× 108 0.3× 496 1.5× 633 2.0× 199 0.9× 37 1.3k
Donna Moxley Scarborough United States 17 539 1.1× 648 1.9× 257 0.8× 232 0.7× 89 0.4× 38 1.6k
Andrew Kerr United Kingdom 20 470 1.0× 318 0.9× 307 0.9× 344 1.1× 58 0.3× 70 1.1k
Alberto Ferrari Italy 16 592 1.2× 640 1.9× 303 0.9× 140 0.4× 241 1.1× 47 1.4k
Roberto Lloréns Spain 22 362 0.8× 196 0.6× 501 1.5× 912 2.9× 249 1.1× 78 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Gill Barry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gill Barry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gill Barry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gill Barry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gill Barry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gill Barry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gill Barry. The network helps show where Gill Barry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gill Barry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gill Barry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gill Barry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gill Barry. Gill Barry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Vitório, Rodrigo, Richard Walker, Gill Barry, et al.. (2024). Digital Eye-Movement Outcomes (DEMOs) as Biomarkers for Neurological Conditions: A Narrative Review. Big Data and Cognitive Computing. 8(12). 198–198. 1 indexed citations
3.
Barry, Gill, Richard Walker, Rodrigo Vitório, et al.. (2024). The feasibility of a visuo-cognitive training intervention using a mobile application and exercise with stroboscopic glasses in Parkinson’s: Findings from a pilot randomised controlled trial. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(12). e0000696–e0000696. 1 indexed citations
4.
Megaritis, Dimitrios, et al.. (2024). Effects of inspiratory muscle training on thoracoabdominal volume regulation in older adults: A randomised controlled trial. Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology. 326. 104278–104278. 2 indexed citations
5.
Vitório, Rodrigo, Gill Barry, Alan Godfrey, et al.. (2023). Visual Exploration While Walking With and Without Visual Cues in Parkinson’s Disease: Freezer Versus Non-Freezer. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair. 37(10). 734–743. 8 indexed citations
6.
Barry, Gill, et al.. (2023). Validity and reliability of the DANU sports system for walking and running gait assessment. Physiological Measurement. 44(11). 115001–115001. 4 indexed citations
7.
Godfrey, Alan, et al.. (2023). Wearables for running gait analysis: A study protocol. PLoS ONE. 18(9). e0291289–e0291289. 7 indexed citations
8.
Barry, Gill, et al.. (2023). Stroboscopic visual training: The potential for clinical application in neurological populations. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2(8). e0000335–e0000335. 8 indexed citations
9.
Barry, Gill, et al.. (2022). Wearables for Running Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review. Sports Medicine. 53(1). 241–268. 66 indexed citations
10.
Behm, David G., et al.. (2022). Effects of maximal-versus submaximal-intent resistance training on functional capacity and strength in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation. 14(1). 129–129. 6 indexed citations
11.
Wu, Jiaen, George Chatzipirpiridis, Chris Awai Easthope, et al.. (2021). An Intelligent In-Shoe System for Gait Monitoring and Analysis with Optimized Sampling and Real-Time Visualization Capabilities. Sensors. 21(8). 2869–2869. 21 indexed citations
14.
Barry, Gill, Paul van Schaik, Alasdair MacSween, John Dixon, & Denis Martin. (2016). Exergaming (XBOX Kinect™) versus traditional gym-based exercise for postural control, flow and technology acceptance in healthy adults: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation. 8(1). 25–25. 39 indexed citations
15.
Barry, Gill, et al.. (2015). Assessing the Physiological Cost of Active Videogames (Xbox Kinect) Versus Sedentary Videogames in Young Healthy Males. Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University). 1 indexed citations
16.
McNaney, Róisín, Madeline Balaam, Guy Schofield, et al.. (2015). Designing for and with people with Parkinson's. Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1 indexed citations
17.
Barry, Gill, Brook Galna, Sue Lord, Lynn Rochester, & Alan Godfrey. (2015). Defining ambulatory bouts in free-living activity: Impact of brief stationary periods on bout metrics. Gait & Posture. 42(4). 594–597. 21 indexed citations
18.
Barry, Gill, et al.. (2015). Assessing the Physiological Cost of Active Videogames (Xbox Kinect) Versus Sedentary Videogames in Young Healthy Males. Games for Health Journal. 5(1). 68–74. 19 indexed citations
19.
Galna, Brook, Dan Jackson, Guy Schofield, et al.. (2014). Retraining function in people with Parkinson’s disease using the Microsoft kinect: game design and pilot testing. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 11(1). 60–60. 112 indexed citations
20.
Barry, Gill. (1988). GEOTEXTILE REPAIRS DETERIORATING FOUR-LANE HIGHWAY. 6(6). 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026