Countries citing papers authored by Gianluca Bocchi
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Gianluca Bocchi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gianluca Bocchi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gianluca Bocchi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gianluca Bocchi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gianluca Bocchi. The network helps show where Gianluca Bocchi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gianluca Bocchi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gianluca Bocchi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gianluca Bocchi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gianluca Bocchi. Gianluca Bocchi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bocchi, Gianluca, et al.. (1997). Solidarity or Barbarism: A Europe of Diversity against Ethnic Cleansing. Medical Entomology and Zoology.4 indexed citations
16.
Bocchi, Gianluca, et al.. (1994). El sentido de la historia: la historia como encadenamiento de historias. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).1 indexed citations
17.
Bocchi, Gianluca, et al.. (1991). Origini DI storie. 44–54.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.