Gian Mario Cherchi
About
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gian Mario Cherchi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gian Mario Cherchi. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gian Mario Cherchi based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gian Mario Cherchi. Gian Mario Cherchi is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Gian Mario Cherchi
22 papers receiving 665 citations
Fields of papers citing papers by Gian Mario Cherchi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gian Mario Cherchi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gian Mario Cherchi. The network helps show where Gian Mario Cherchi may publish in the future.
Countries citing papers authored by Gian Mario Cherchi
This map shows the geographic impact of Gian Mario Cherchi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gian Mario Cherchi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gian Mario Cherchi more than expected).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.