Gesa Geißler

408 total citations
21 papers, 262 citations indexed

About

Gesa Geißler is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Sociology and Political Science and Building and Construction. According to data from OpenAlex, Gesa Geißler has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 262 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in Building and Construction. Recurrent topics in Gesa Geißler's work include Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (13 papers), Mining and Resource Management (7 papers) and Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (5 papers). Gesa Geißler is often cited by papers focused on Environmental and Social Impact Assessments (13 papers), Mining and Resource Management (7 papers) and Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (5 papers). Gesa Geißler collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Austria and United Kingdom. Gesa Geißler's co-authors include Johann Köppel, Alexandra Jiricka-Pürrer, Thomas B. Fischer, Marie Hanusch, Wolfgang Wende, Ralf‐Uwe Syrbe, Reece Alberts, Urmila Jha‐Thakur, François Retief and Markus Günther and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Environmental Management and Renewable Energy.

In The Last Decade

Gesa Geißler

21 papers receiving 256 citations

Peers

Gesa Geißler
Mohamed A. Rabie United States
Simon Marsden Australia
Rob Verheem Netherlands
Neil Craik Canada
John Bailey Australia
Gesa Geißler
Citations per year, relative to Gesa Geißler Gesa Geißler (= 1×) peers Asha Rajvanshi

Countries citing papers authored by Gesa Geißler

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gesa Geißler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gesa Geißler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gesa Geißler more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gesa Geißler

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gesa Geißler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gesa Geißler. The network helps show where Gesa Geißler may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gesa Geißler

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gesa Geißler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gesa Geißler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gesa Geißler. Gesa Geißler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rodrigues, Tiago, Gesa Geißler, & Marcelo Montaño. (2024). Addressing climate change in Berlin's local land-use plans through strategic environmental assessment and knowledge brokering. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 110. 107651–107651. 4 indexed citations
2.
Morrison‐Saunders, Angus, Jos Arts, Richard Morgan, et al.. (2024). Developing international guidance to make impact assessment follow-up happen – reflections on an interactive design process. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 42(5). 470–481. 1 indexed citations
3.
Geißler, Gesa, et al.. (2024). AI will change EA practice – but are we ready for it? A call for discussion based on developments in collecting and processing biodiversity data. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 42(2). 200–208. 12 indexed citations
4.
Geißler, Gesa, et al.. (2024). Exploring the uptake of advanced digital technologies in environmental assessment practice - Experiences from Austria and Germany. Journal of Environmental Management. 364. 121412–121412. 2 indexed citations
5.
Geißler, Gesa & Alexandra Jiricka-Pürrer. (2023). The future of impact assessment in Austria and Germany – streamlining impact assessment to save the planet?. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 41(3). 215–222. 9 indexed citations
7.
Fischer, Thomas B., Alberto Fonseca, Gesa Geißler, et al.. (2023). Simplification of environmental and other impact assessments – results from an international online survey. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 41(3). 181–189. 18 indexed citations
8.
Geißler, Gesa, Katarzyna Tokarczyk‐Dorociak, Alexandra Jiricka-Pürrer, & Thomas B. Fischer. (2022). Perceived benefits and challenges of academic involvement in three strategic environmental assessments in Central Europe. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 99. 106986–106986. 3 indexed citations
9.
Albert, Christian, Rieke Hansen, Alexandra Dehnhardt, et al.. (2021). Das Ökosystemleistungskonzept in der räumlichen Planung – zehn Thesen. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 80(1). 7–21. 2 indexed citations
10.
Deppisch, Sonja, et al.. (2021). Ansätze zur Integration von Ökosystemleistungen in die formelle räumliche Planung. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 80(1). 80–96. 3 indexed citations
11.
Geißler, Gesa, et al.. (2019). Effectiveness of strategic environmental assessment in Germany? – meta-review of SEA research in the light of effectiveness dimensions. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 37(3-4). 219–232. 25 indexed citations
12.
Köppel, Johann, et al.. (2019). Implementing strategic environmental assessment in countries of the global South – An analysis within the Peruvian context. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 77. 23–39. 15 indexed citations
13.
Köppel, Johann, et al.. (2019). A Shift Towards Landscape-Scale Approaches in Compensation - Suitable Mechanisms and Open Questions. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal. 37(6). 491–502. 9 indexed citations
14.
Köppel, Johann, et al.. (2018). Quality of federal level strategic environmental assessment – A case study analysis for transport, transmission grid and maritime spatial planning in Germany. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 73. 41–59. 36 indexed citations
15.
Geißler, Gesa, et al.. (2016). Mitigation Measures for Wildlife in Wind Energy Development, Consolidating the State of Knowledge — Part 1: Planning and Siting, Construction. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 18(3). 1650013–1650013. 20 indexed citations
16.
Geißler, Gesa, et al.. (2016). Mitigation Measures for Wildlife in Wind Energy Development, Consolidating the State of Knowledge — Part 2: Operation, Decommissioning. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 18(3). 1650014–1650014. 17 indexed citations
17.
Günther, Markus, Gesa Geißler, & Johann Köppel. (2016). Many roads may lead to Rome: Selected features of quality control within environmental assessment systems in the US, NL, CA, and UK. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. 62. 250–258. 10 indexed citations
18.
Geißler, Gesa, et al.. (2015). ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT RESEARCH IN GERMANY: RETROSPECT AND PROSPECT. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 17(1). 1550010–1550010. 3 indexed citations
19.
Geißler, Gesa. (2013). STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENTS FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT — COMPARING THE UNITED STATES AND GERMANY. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 15(2). 1340003–1340003. 15 indexed citations
20.
Köppel, Johann, et al.. (2012). A SNAPSHOT OF GERMANY'S EIA APPROACH IN LIGHT OF THE UNITED STATES ARCHETYPE. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management. 14(4). 1250022–1250022. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026