Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: A review
20191.7k citationsGerman I. Parisi, Ronald Kemker et al.Neural Networksprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by German I. Parisi
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of German I. Parisi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by German I. Parisi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites German I. Parisi more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by German I. Parisi
This network shows the impact of papers produced by German I. Parisi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by German I. Parisi. The network helps show where German I. Parisi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of German I. Parisi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of German I. Parisi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of German I. Parisi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with German I. Parisi. German I. Parisi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Barros, Pablo, German I. Parisi, & Stefan Wermter. (2019). A Personalized Affective Memory Model for Improving Emotion Recognition. International Conference on Machine Learning. 485–494.15 indexed citations
3.
Parisi, German I., Ronald Kemker, Jose L. Part, Christopher Kanan, & Stefan Wermter. (2019). Continual lifelong learning with neural networks: A review. Neural Networks. 113. 54–71.1665 indexed citations breakdown →
Barros, Pablo, German I. Parisi, Di Fu, Xun Liu, & Stefan Wermter. (2018). Expectation Learning and Crossmodal Modulation with a Deep Adversarial Network. Institutional Repository of Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences). 82. 1–8.1 indexed citations
8.
Parisi, German I. & Stefan Wermter. (2017). Lifelong Learning of Action Representations with Deep Neural Self-Organization.. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence.2 indexed citations
Parisi, German I., et al.. (2016). SLIRS: Sign language interpreting system for human-robot interaction. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 94–99.2 indexed citations
13.
Sandygulova, Anara, et al.. (2016). Child-Centred Motion-Based Age and Gender Estimation with Neural Network Learning. National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 47–52.2 indexed citations
Barros, Pablo, et al.. (2015). Learning objects from RGB-D sensors using point cloud-based neural networks.. The European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks.2 indexed citations
16.
Parisi, German I., et al.. (2015). A Multi-modal Approach for Assistive Humanoid Robots.. 10–15.1 indexed citations
17.
Parisi, German I., Pablo Barros, & Stefan Wermter. (2014). FINGeR: Framework for Interactive Neural-based Gesture Recognition. The European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.