Gergely Balázs

516 total citations
32 papers, 317 citations indexed

About

Gergely Balázs is a scholar working on Paleontology, Ecology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Gergely Balázs has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 317 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Paleontology, 22 papers in Ecology and 8 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Gergely Balázs's work include Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy (22 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (11 papers) and Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (10 papers). Gergely Balázs is often cited by papers focused on Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy (22 papers), Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (11 papers) and Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (10 papers). Gergely Balázs collaborates with scholars based in Hungary, Slovenia and Finland. Gergely Balázs's co-authors include Gábor Herczeg, Heather D. Bracken‐Grissom, Cene Fišer, Juha Merilä, Abigél Gonda, Gergely Horváth, Denis Copilaş‐Ciocianu, Žiga Fišer, Arild Husby and Adam Petrusek and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Molecular Ecology.

In The Last Decade

Gergely Balázs

29 papers receiving 312 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gergely Balázs Hungary 11 172 150 101 82 49 32 317
Jonathan R. Hendricks United States 9 137 0.8× 188 1.3× 65 0.6× 114 1.4× 47 1.0× 18 445
Marie‐Claire Chelini United States 10 99 0.6× 126 0.8× 135 1.3× 177 2.2× 113 2.3× 15 326
Allison Y. Hsiang United States 8 59 0.3× 190 1.3× 131 1.3× 51 0.6× 56 1.1× 14 366
Michael R. Warburg Israel 11 256 1.5× 105 0.7× 111 1.1× 159 1.9× 159 3.2× 29 501
Frederick G. Hochberg United States 8 175 1.0× 39 0.3× 72 0.7× 222 2.7× 38 0.8× 11 357
Lauren Sumner‐Rooney United Kingdom 11 85 0.5× 86 0.6× 62 0.6× 106 1.3× 64 1.3× 33 346
Samuel H. Church United States 7 74 0.4× 149 1.0× 83 0.8× 54 0.7× 70 1.4× 11 276
S. H. D. Haddock United States 9 154 0.9× 168 1.1× 156 1.5× 75 0.9× 40 0.8× 13 442
Camille Grohé France 12 172 1.0× 258 1.7× 39 0.4× 145 1.8× 14 0.3× 26 366
Tess A. Linden United States 4 59 0.3× 151 1.0× 111 1.1× 48 0.6× 75 1.5× 5 338

Countries citing papers authored by Gergely Balázs

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gergely Balázs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gergely Balázs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gergely Balázs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gergely Balázs

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gergely Balázs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gergely Balázs. The network helps show where Gergely Balázs may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gergely Balázs

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gergely Balázs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gergely Balázs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gergely Balázs. Gergely Balázs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mori, Nataša, Traian Brad, Gergely Balázs, et al.. (2025). A Comprehensive Occurrence Dataset for European Ostracoda Inhabiting Groundwater and Groundwater‐Dependent Ecosystems. Global Ecology and Biogeography. 34(6).
2.
Balázs, Gergely, et al.. (2024). From darkness to twilight: Morphological divergence between cave and surface‐subterranean ecotone Niphargus species. Ecology and Evolution. 14(8). e70061–e70061. 1 indexed citations
3.
Fišer, Žiga, Denis Copilaş‐Ciocianu, Lutz Fromhage, et al.. (2024). Sexual dimorphism in subterranean amphipod crustaceans covaries with subterranean habitat type. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 37(5). 487–500. 4 indexed citations
4.
Herczeg, Gábor, et al.. (2023). Island and Rensch’s rules do not apply to cave vs. surface populations of Asellus aquaticus. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. 11. 2 indexed citations
5.
Balázs, Gergely, et al.. (2023). Not the Last Piece of the Puzzle: Niphargus Phylogeny in Hungary. Diversity. 15(2). 223–223. 1 indexed citations
6.
Horváth, Gergely, et al.. (2023). Exploratory behaviour divergence between surface populations, cave colonists and a cave population in the water louse, Asellus aquaticus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 77(1). 8 indexed citations
7.
Horváth, Gergely, et al.. (2022). Sex-dependent increase of movement activity in the freshwater isopodAsellus aquaticusfollowing adaptation to a predator-free cave habitat. Current Zoology. 69(4). 418–425. 6 indexed citations
9.
Borko, Špela, Simona Kralj‐Fišer, Michael D. Jennions, et al.. (2021). No room for males in caves: Female‐biased sex ratio in subterranean amphipods of the genus Niphargus. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 34(10). 1653–1661. 5 indexed citations
10.
Herczeg, Gábor, et al.. (2021). Food preference and food type innovation of surface- vs. cave-dwelling waterlouse (Asellus aquaticus) after 60 000 years of isolation. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 76(1). 4 indexed citations
11.
Borko, Špela, Simona Kralj‐Fišer, Žiga Fišer, et al.. (2021). No room for males in caves: female-biased sex ratio in subterranean amphipods of the genus Niphargus. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 1 indexed citations
12.
Horváth, Gergely, et al.. (2021). Population divergence in aggregation and sheltering behaviour in surface- versus cave-adapted Asellus aquaticus (Crustacea: Isopoda). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 134(3). 667–678. 8 indexed citations
13.
Balázs, Gergely, et al.. (2020). Extreme site fidelity of the olm (Proteus anguinus) revealed by a long‐term capture–mark–recapture study. Journal of Zoology. 311(2). 99–105. 19 indexed citations
14.
Kralj‐Fišer, Simona, Denis Copilaş‐Ciocianu, Žiga Fišer, et al.. (2020). The interplay between habitat use, morphology and locomotion in subterranean crustaceans of the genus Niphargus. Zoology. 139. 125742–125742. 17 indexed citations
15.
Herczeg, Gábor, et al.. (2020). Is foraging innovation lost following colonization of a less variable environment? A case study in surface‐ vs. cave‐dwellingAsellus aquaticus. Ecology and Evolution. 10(12). 5323–5331. 7 indexed citations
16.
Balázs, Gergely, et al.. (2020). A new non-invasive in situ underwater DNA sampling method for estimating genetic diversity. Evolutionary Ecology. 34(4). 633–644. 5 indexed citations
17.
Horváth, Gergely, et al.. (2019). Roll with the fear: environment and state dependence of pill bug (Armadillidium vulgare) personalities. Die Naturwissenschaften. 106(3-4). 7–7. 21 indexed citations
18.
Balázs, Gergely, et al.. (2017). The role of isolation on contrasting phylogeographic patterns in two cave crustaceans. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 17(1). 247–247. 22 indexed citations
19.
20.
Balázs, Gergely, et al.. (2014). Remarks on the earthworm genus Helodrilus Hoffmeister, 1845 with new epigean and subterranean records (Oligochaeta, Lumbricidae). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026