Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Intelligent Products: A survey
2009320 citationsGerben G. Meyer, Kary Främling et al.Computers in Industryprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Gerben G. Meyer
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Gerben G. Meyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerben G. Meyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerben G. Meyer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerben G. Meyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerben G. Meyer. The network helps show where Gerben G. Meyer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gerben G. Meyer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gerben G. Meyer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gerben G. Meyer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Gerben G. Meyer. Gerben G. Meyer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Meyer, Gerben G.. (2011). Effective monitoring and control with intelligent products. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).10 indexed citations
6.
Makoschey, B., Paul Franken, Éric Dubois, et al.. (2011). IBR and BVD control: the key to successful herd management.. PubMed. 123(11-12). 519–21, 516.7 indexed citations
Szirbik, Nick, et al.. (2009). Proceedings of the 18th IEEE international workshops on enabling technologies: Infrastructures for collaborative enterprises, 2009 (WETICE '09).2 indexed citations
Meyer, Gerben G., Kary Främling, & Jan Holmström. (2009). Intelligent Products: A survey. Computers in Industry. 60(3). 137–148.320 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Meyer, Gerben G. & J.C. Wortmann. (2009). Robust Planning and Control Using Intelligent Products.. 163–177.1 indexed citations
13.
Meyer, Gerben G. & Nick Szirbik. (2007). Anticipatory alignment mechanisms for behavioural learning in multi-agent systems. Lecture notes in computer science. 4520. 325–344.3 indexed citations
14.
Meyer, Gerben G. & Nick Szirbik. (2006). Behaviour alignement as a mechanism for anticipatory agent interaction. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 46–57.
15.
Hesselink, Wim H., Gerben G. Meyer, Katja Verbeeck, et al.. (2005). Proceedings of the 17th Belgium-Netherlands Conference on Artificial Intelligence.17 indexed citations
16.
Meyer, Gerben G., et al.. (2003). INTEGRATING PLCS WITH AN OPC INTERFACE INTO AN EPICS BASED CONTROL SYSTEM.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.