George W. Teebor

3.9k total citations
59 papers, 3.3k citations indexed

About

George W. Teebor is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cancer Research and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, George W. Teebor has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 3.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Molecular Biology, 14 papers in Cancer Research and 7 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in George W. Teebor's work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (33 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (25 papers) and Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (11 papers). George W. Teebor is often cited by papers focused on DNA Repair Mechanisms (33 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (25 papers) and Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (11 papers). George W. Teebor collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Poland. George W. Teebor's co-authors include Robert J. Boorstein, Krystyna Frenkel, Richard P. Cunningham, Jean Cadet, Frederick F. Becker, Nahum J. Duker, Irving Seidman, M. Daniel Lane, Huei-Che Chang and Michael K. Chan and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Nucleic Acids Research.

In The Last Decade

George W. Teebor

58 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
George W. Teebor United States 35 2.6k 801 433 238 192 59 3.3k
Ziro Yamaizumi United Kingdom 32 3.1k 1.2× 854 1.1× 614 1.4× 207 0.9× 114 0.6× 93 4.4k
Leila Diamond United States 28 2.0k 0.8× 912 1.1× 533 1.2× 314 1.3× 157 0.8× 70 3.2k
J. Martin Brown United States 21 2.1k 0.8× 524 0.7× 589 1.4× 299 1.3× 92 0.5× 33 3.1k
Gladys F. Maley United States 41 3.8k 1.5× 367 0.5× 864 2.0× 414 1.7× 246 1.3× 119 4.7k
Dennis E. Danley United States 31 2.7k 1.0× 644 0.8× 385 0.9× 242 1.0× 92 0.5× 52 4.1k
Shonen Yoshida Japan 39 2.8k 1.1× 387 0.5× 574 1.3× 308 1.3× 318 1.7× 140 4.2k
P. F. Crain United States 24 3.0k 1.1× 537 0.7× 224 0.5× 128 0.5× 65 0.3× 40 3.7k
Alan J. Townsend United States 33 1.9k 0.7× 322 0.4× 756 1.7× 207 0.9× 115 0.6× 60 2.7k
Scott B. Daniels United States 14 3.2k 1.2× 219 0.3× 288 0.7× 152 0.6× 166 0.9× 17 4.3k
Michelle F. Browner United States 28 1.6k 0.6× 422 0.5× 457 1.1× 301 1.3× 185 1.0× 41 3.2k

Countries citing papers authored by George W. Teebor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George W. Teebor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George W. Teebor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George W. Teebor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George W. Teebor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George W. Teebor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George W. Teebor. The network helps show where George W. Teebor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George W. Teebor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George W. Teebor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George W. Teebor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George W. Teebor. George W. Teebor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Linehan, Erin K., et al.. (2012). The DNA Glycosylases Ogg1 and Nth1 Do Not Contribute to Ig Class Switching in Activated Mouse Splenic B Cells. PLoS ONE. 7(4). e36061–e36061. 4 indexed citations
2.
Chan, Michael K., Maria Ocampo‐Hafalla, Vladimir L. Vartanian, et al.. (2009). Targeted deletion of the genes encoding NTH1 and NEIL1 DNA N-glycosylases reveals the existence of novel carcinogenic oxidative damage to DNA. DNA repair. 8(7). 786–794. 99 indexed citations
3.
Ocampo‐Hafalla, Maria, Alvin Altamirano, Ashis K. Basu, et al.. (2006). Repair of thymine glycol by hNth1 and hNeil1 is modulated by base pairing and cis–trans epimerization. DNA repair. 5(4). 444–454. 33 indexed citations
4.
Braithwaite, Elena K., Padmini S. Kedar, Li Lan, et al.. (2005). DNA Polymerase λ Protects Mouse Fibroblasts against Oxidative DNA Damage and Is Recruited to Sites of DNA Damage/Repair. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 280(36). 31641–31647. 97 indexed citations
5.
Wilson, David M., et al.. (2004). Human AP endonuclease (APE1) demonstrates endonucleolytic activity against AP sites in single-stranded DNA. DNA repair. 3(5). 527–533. 69 indexed citations
6.
Chan, Michael K., Alvin Altamirano, Ashis K. Basu, et al.. (2003). Substrate Specificity of Human Endonuclease III (hNTH1). Journal of Biological Chemistry. 278(11). 9005–9012. 93 indexed citations
7.
Boorstein, Robert J., Michael K. Chan, Yuliang Ma, et al.. (2001). Definitive Identification of Mammalian 5-Hydroxymethyluracil DNA N-Glycosylase Activity as SMUG1. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 276(45). 41991–41997. 114 indexed citations
8.
Altamirano, Alvin, et al.. (2001). Stimulation of Human Endonuclease III by Y Box-binding Protein 1 (DNA-binding Protein B). Journal of Biological Chemistry. 276(24). 21242–21249. 112 indexed citations
9.
Chaung, Wenren, et al.. (2000). 5-Chloro-2′-deoxyuridine cytotoxicity results from base excision repair of uracil subsequent to thymidylate synthase inhibition. Mutation Research/DNA Repair. 459(2). 161–169. 24 indexed citations
11.
Chaung, Wenren, et al.. (1997). Cloning and Expression of the cDNA Encoding the Human Homologue of the DNA Repair Enzyme, Escherichia coli Endonuclease III. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 272(10). 6733–6740. 124 indexed citations
12.
Teebor, George W., et al.. (1995). Oxidative damage to 5-methylcytosine in DNA. Nucleic Acids Research. 23(16). 3239–3243. 70 indexed citations
14.
Boorstein, Robert J., et al.. (1990). Formation and stability of repairable pyrimidine photohydrates in DNA. Biochemistry. 29(46). 10455–10460. 60 indexed citations
15.
Boorstein, R & George W. Teebor. (1989). Effects of 5-hydroxymethyluracil and 3-aminobenzamide on the repair and toxicity of 5-hydroxymethyl-2'-deoxyuridine in mammalian cells.. PubMed. 49(6). 1509–14. 24 indexed citations
16.
Boorstein, Robert J., et al.. (1989). UV-induced pyrimidine hydrates in DNA are repaired by bacterial and mammalian DNA glycosylase activities. Biochemistry. 28(15). 6164–6170. 94 indexed citations
17.
Boorstein, Robert J., et al.. (1989). Phylogenetic evidence of a role for 5-hydroxymethyluracil-DNA glycosylase in the maintenance of 5-methylcytosine in DNA. Nucleic Acids Research. 17(19). 7653–7661. 35 indexed citations
18.
Teebor, George W., Robert J. Boorstein, & Jean Cadet. (1988). The Repairability of Oxidative Free Radical Mediated Damage to DNA: A Review. International Journal of Radiation Biology. 54(2). 131–150. 163 indexed citations
19.
Teebor, George W., et al.. (1988). 5-hydroxymethylcytosine DNA glycosylase activity in mammalian tissue. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 151(3). 1173–1179. 78 indexed citations
20.
Duker, Nahum J. & George W. Teebor. (1975). Different ultraviolet DNA endonuclease activity in human cells. Nature. 255(5503). 82–84. 40 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026