George Khushf

816 total citations
36 papers, 339 citations indexed

About

George Khushf is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Biomedical Engineering and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, George Khushf has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 339 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 8 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 7 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in George Khushf's work include Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (11 papers), Nanotechnology research and applications (4 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (4 papers). George Khushf is often cited by papers focused on Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (11 papers), Nanotechnology research and applications (4 papers) and Ethics in medical practice (4 papers). George Khushf collaborates with scholars based in United States. George Khushf's co-authors include Lennart Nordenfelt, Robert G. Best, Theresa A. Grebe, Laurie H. Seaver, Marc S. Williams, Margaret Chen, Robert M. Sade, Ronald A. Siegel, Nastaran Foyouzi and H. Tristram Engelhardt and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences and BMJ Open.

In The Last Decade

George Khushf

33 papers receiving 294 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
George Khushf United States 12 95 90 73 61 40 36 339
Ronald Munson United States 7 67 0.7× 54 0.6× 36 0.5× 19 0.3× 21 0.5× 13 234
S. G. Post United States 8 75 0.8× 77 0.9× 18 0.2× 21 0.3× 82 2.0× 23 311
Bettina Schöne-Seifert Germany 11 106 1.1× 154 1.7× 31 0.4× 99 1.6× 23 0.6× 50 543
Jan Helge Solbakk Norway 11 137 1.4× 191 2.1× 16 0.2× 26 0.4× 12 0.3× 42 324
Olivia S O'Neill Canada 4 200 2.1× 205 2.3× 23 0.3× 35 0.6× 20 0.5× 9 398
William E. Stempsey United States 11 90 0.9× 71 0.8× 59 0.8× 25 0.4× 50 1.3× 29 232
Claudia Bozzaro Germany 9 65 0.7× 88 1.0× 17 0.2× 16 0.3× 26 0.7× 42 243
Corinna Porteri Italy 11 89 0.9× 199 2.2× 24 0.3× 9 0.1× 83 2.1× 29 322
Jonathan Sholl France 11 27 0.3× 31 0.3× 52 0.7× 18 0.3× 26 0.7× 23 246
Benjamin Hope United Kingdom 2 52 0.5× 37 0.4× 31 0.4× 11 0.2× 23 0.6× 4 277

Countries citing papers authored by George Khushf

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Khushf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Khushf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Khushf more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Khushf

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Khushf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Khushf. The network helps show where George Khushf may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Khushf

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Khushf. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Khushf based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Khushf. George Khushf is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Grebe, Theresa A., George Khushf, John M. Greally, et al.. (2024). Clinical utility of polygenic risk scores for embryo selection: A points to consider statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genetics in Medicine. 26(4). 101052–101052. 8 indexed citations
2.
Qiao, Shan, George Khushf, Xiaoming Li, Jiajia Zhang, & Bankole Olatosi. (2023). Developing an ethical framework-guided instrument for assessing bias in EHR-based Big Data studies: a research protocol. BMJ Open. 13(8). e070870–e070870. 2 indexed citations
4.
Khushf, George. (2019). When Religious Language Blocks Discussion About Health Care Decision Making. HEC Forum. 31(2). 151–166. 5 indexed citations
5.
Khushf, George. (2013). Beware of mereologists bearing gifts: prolegomena to a medical metaphysics. Metamedicine. 34(5). 385–408.
6.
Khushf, George. (2013). A Framework for Understanding Medical Epistemologies. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 38(5). 461–486. 14 indexed citations
7.
Khushf, George & Ronald A. Siegel. (2012). What is Unique about Nanomedicine? The Significance of the Mesoscale. The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. 40(4). 780–794. 3 indexed citations
8.
Khushf, George. (2010). A Matter of Respect: A Defense of the Dead Donor Rule and of a "Whole-Brain" Criterion for Determination of Death. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 35(3). 330–364. 28 indexed citations
9.
Khushf, George, et al.. (2008). The Institute of Medicine’s Reports on Quality and Safety: Paradoxes and Tensions. HEC Forum. 20(1). 1–14. 3 indexed citations
10.
Khushf, George. (2007). Open Questions in the Ethics of Convergence. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 32(3). 299–310. 5 indexed citations
11.
Khushf, George. (2007). Importance of a Midterm Time Horizon for Addressing Ethical Issues Integral to Nanobiotechnology. Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants. 17(3). 263–269. 1 indexed citations
12.
Khushf, George. (2007). The Ethics of NBIC Convergence. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 32(3). 185–196. 6 indexed citations
13.
Best, Robert G. & George Khushf. (2006). The Social Conditions for Nanomedicine: Disruption, Systems, and Lock-In. The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. 34(4). 733–740. 9 indexed citations
14.
Best, Robert G., George Khushf, & Robin Wilson. (2006). A Sympathetic but Critical Assessment of Nanotechnology Initiatives. The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. 34(4). 655–657. 2 indexed citations
15.
Khushf, George. (2006). Owning up to Our Agendas: On the Role and Limits of Science in Debates about Embryos and Brain Death. The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics. 34(1). 58–76. 5 indexed citations
16.
Khushf, George. (1999). The Case for Managed Care: Reappraising Medical and Socio-Political Ideals. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 24(5). 415–433. 10 indexed citations
17.
Khushf, George. (1999). The Aesthetics of Clinical Judgment: Exploring the Link between Diagnostic Elegance and Effective Resource Utilization. Medicine Health Care and Philosophy. 2(2). 141–159. 12 indexed citations
18.
Khushf, George. (1998). A Radical Rupture in the Paradigm of Modern Medicine: Conflicts of Interest, Fiduciary Obligations, and the Scientific Ideal. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 23(1). 98–122. 13 indexed citations
19.
Khushf, George. (1997). Embryo Research: The Ethical Geography of the Debate. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy A Forum for Bioethics and Philosophy of Medicine. 22(5). 495–519. 11 indexed citations
20.
Khushf, George. (1997). Announcing a New Section and a Call for Papers Administrative and Organizational Ethics. HEC Forum. 9(4). 299–309. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026