George E. Hein

732 total citations
23 papers, 575 citations indexed

About

George E. Hein is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Spectroscopy and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, George E. Hein has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 575 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Molecular Biology, 8 papers in Spectroscopy and 6 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in George E. Hein's work include Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (7 papers), Enzyme function and inhibition (5 papers) and Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (5 papers). George E. Hein is often cited by papers focused on Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (7 papers), Enzyme function and inhibition (5 papers) and Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (5 papers). George E. Hein collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. George E. Hein's co-authors include Carl Niemann, Peter A. S. Smith, Suriender Kumar, Barbara M. Sanborn, J. Bryan Jones, G L Neil, Toyoki Kunitake, Kenneth L. Powell, Wilhelm Kuchen and Robert A. Wallace and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

In The Last Decade

George E. Hein

23 papers receiving 485 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
George E. Hein United States	13	376	162	125	64	52	23	575
Eugen Schnabel Germany	15	739 2.0×	380 2.3×	119 1.0×	59 0.9×	48 0.9×	44	995
E. Hansbury United States	13	487 1.3×	128 0.8×	62 0.5×	42 0.7×	51 1.0×	30	784
C. H. Robinson United States	17	452 1.2×	319 2.0×	91 0.7×	29 0.5×	49 0.9×	51	1.0k
J. V. Killheffer United States	7	349 0.9×	112 0.7×	67 0.5×	22 0.3×	47 0.9×	9	501
Helga Polet United States	7	508 1.4×	157 1.0×	163 1.3×	31 0.5×	170 3.3×	10	716
Peter Mohr Switzerland	13	487 1.3×	192 1.2×	72 0.6×	47 0.7×	33 0.6×	21	644
Kasturi Srinivasachar United States	12	274 0.7×	181 1.1×	230 1.8×	30 0.5×	21 0.4×	19	840
Gilbert Schlewer France	15	459 1.2×	406 2.5×	78 0.6×	41 0.6×	40 0.8×	66	910
Sudarshan K. Malhotra Canada	13	276 0.7×	314 1.9×	86 0.7×	22 0.3×	29 0.6×	22	645
Jehan F. Bagli United States	16	442 1.2×	441 2.7×	40 0.3×	46 0.7×	47 0.9×	47	897

Countries citing papers authored by George E. Hein

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George E. Hein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George E. Hein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George E. Hein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George E. Hein

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George E. Hein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George E. Hein. The network helps show where George E. Hein may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George E. Hein

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George E. Hein. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George E. Hein based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George E. Hein. George E. Hein is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Hein, George E., et al.. (1990). üBER DIE INSERTION VON RPS₂IN DIE PN-BINDUNG VON AMINOPHOSPHINEN. Phosphorus, sulfur, and silicon and the related elements. 53(1-4). 339–356. 5 indexed citations

Hein, George E., et al.. (1990). CHIRALETHIOPHOSPHORYLTHIOPHOSPHINE [(R₂′N)ArP(S)-S-]_nPR(NR₂′)_2-n (n=1, 2) ALS LIGANDEN IN CARBONYLMETALL(O)KOMPLEXEN. Phosphorus, sulfur, and silicon and the related elements. 54(1-4). 157–169. 3 indexed citations

Lenz, David E. & George E. Hein. (1970). Acetylcholinesterase: New evidence for an acetyl-enzyme intermediate. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Enzymology. 220(3). 617–621. 2 indexed citations

Kumar, Suriender & George E. Hein. (1970). Mechanism of autolysis of α-chymotrypsin. Biochemistry. 9(2). 291–297. 36 indexed citations

Kumar, Suriender & George E. Hein. (1970). Structural and steric specificity of α-chloroketones as inhibitors of α-chymotrypsin. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Enzymology. 206(3). 404–413. 2 indexed citations

Sanborn, Barbara M. & George E. Hein. (1968). The interaction of trypsin with neutral substrates and modifiers. Biochemistry. 7(10). 3616–3624. 39 indexed citations

Hein, George E. & Kenneth L. Powell. (1967). Evaluation of kinetic constants for mixed inhibitors of cholinesterase. Biochemical Pharmacology. 16(3). 567–573. 14 indexed citations

Sanborn, Barbara M. & George E. Hein. (1967). On the interaction of trypsin with neutral substrates and inhibitors. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Enzymology. 139(2). 524–526. 6 indexed citations

Wallace, Robert A., Roger L. Peterson, Carl Niemann, & George E. Hein. (1966). Activation of chymotrypsin catalyted hydrolyses by 9-aminoacridine. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 23(3). 246–251. 9 indexed citations

10.

Ponzi, Dagmar R. & George E. Hein. (1966). Stereospecific activation of chymotrypsin catalyzed hydrolyses. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 25(1). 60–65. 4 indexed citations

11.

Neil, G L, Carl Niemann, & George E. Hein. (1966). Structural Specificity of α-Chymotrypsin: Polypeptide Substrates. Nature. 210(5039). 903–907. 48 indexed citations

12.

Niemann, Carl, et al.. (1966). The Primary Specificity of Chymotrypsin. Further Evidence for “Wrong-Way” Binding^*. Biochemistry. 5(12). 4100–4105. 12 indexed citations

13.

Jones, J. Bryan, Toyoki Kunitake, Carl Niemann, & George E. Hein. (1965). The Primary Specificity of α-Chymotrypsin. Acylated Amino Acid Esters with Normal Alkyl Side Chains¹. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 87(8). 1777–1781. 42 indexed citations

14.

Jones, J. Bryan, Carl Niemann, & George E. Hein. (1965). The Primary Specificity of α-Chymotrypsin. Interaction with Acylated Derivatives of D-Valine Methyl Ester and D-Norvaline Methyl Ester^*. Biochemistry. 4(9). 1735–1739. 11 indexed citations

15.

Hein, George E.. (1963). The reaction of tertiary amines with nitrous acid. Journal of Chemical Education. 40(4). 181–181. 22 indexed citations

16.

Hein, George E. & Carl Niemann. (1962). Steric Course and Specificity of α-Chymotrypsin-catalyzed Reactions. II. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 84(23). 4495–4503. 69 indexed citations

17.

Hein, George E.. (1962). Multi-Step Mechanisms for Cholinesterase Activity. Nature. 193(4821). 1155–1156. 3 indexed citations

18.

Hein, George E. & Carl Niemann. (1961). AN INTERPRETATION OF THE KINETIC BEHAVIOR OF MODEL SUBSTRATES OF α-CHYMOTRYPSIN. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 47(9). 1341–1355. 44 indexed citations

19.

Hein, George E., et al.. (1960). AN INVERSION OF THE USUAL ANTIPODAL SPECIFICITY OBSERVED IN α-CHYMOTRYPSIN CATALYZED REACTIONS¹. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 82(7). 1830–1831. 22 indexed citations

20.

Smith, Peter A. S. & George E. Hein. (1960). The Alleged Role of Nitroxyl in Certain Reactions of Aldehydes and Alkyl Halides¹. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 82(21). 5731–5740. 73 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact