George C. Scott

22 papers receiving 314 citations

Peers

George C. Scott
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Agronomy and Crop Science 112
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 47
  • Small Animals 46
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 45
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 40
Replace D. A. Fitzpatrick with:
D. A. Fitzpatrick Iran
Stephen K. Curtis United States
Shubhra Agarwal India
P S MacWilliams United States
Katsuya ISHIHARA Japan
Tanya Graham United States
Satoshi Hidaka Japan
B J McSherry Canada
Yayu Huang France
Crowell Wa United States
George C. Scott relative to D. A. Fitzpatrick Iran D. A. Fitzpatrick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.7×
D. A. Fitzpatrick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George C. Scott

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George C. Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George C. Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George C. Scott more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George C. Scott

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George C. Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George C. Scott. The network helps show where George C. Scott may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George C. Scott

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George C. Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George C. Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George C. Scott. George C. Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 5
2 2
3 1
4 4
5
What is the next step in patient decision support?
11
6
Extending contemporary decision support system designs to patient-oriented systems.
7
7 42
8
SecondOpinion: interactive Web-based access to a decision model.
10
9 23
10
Cervical lymph node metastasis of thyroid papillary carcinoma imaged with fluorine-18-FDG, technetium-99m-pertechnetate and iodine-131-sodium iodide.
50
11 5
12
Protein nutrition of growing cattle
4
13 28
14 16
15 51
16 26
17 3
18 1
19 2
20 1

About George C. Scott

George C. Scott is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Small Animals and Animal Science and Zoology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 349 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Animal Nutrition and Physiology (4 papers), Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (3 papers) and Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Agronomy and Crop Science (112 citations), Small Animals (46 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (37 citations). George C. Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Puerto Rico and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Roger C. Parish, Christine Z. Dickinson, Donald A. Meier, Leslie Lenert, V. J. Theodorides, G. T. Schelling, John E. Chandler, Conrad E. Nagle, Howard J. Dworkin and Darlene Fink-Bennett. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Dairy Science, Journal of Animal Science and Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026