George C. Peck

37 total papers · 698 total citations
25 papers, 380 citations indexed

About

George C. Peck is a scholar working on Surgery, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, George C. Peck has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 380 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Surgery, 9 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 8 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in George C. Peck's work include Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies (16 papers), Digital Imaging in Medicine (9 papers) and Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (8 papers). George C. Peck is often cited by papers focused on Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies (16 papers), Digital Imaging in Medicine (9 papers) and Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (8 papers). George C. Peck collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and United Kingdom. George C. Peck's co-authors include Ronald P. Gruber, Rod J. Rohrich, Peter M. Elias, Mark B. Constantian, Richard Carlton Schultz, Jacob Jay Lindenthal, Philip Cohen, Paul R. Weiss, Arthur G. Ship and Rollin K. Daniel and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery and Clinics in Plastic Surgery.

In The Last Decade

George C. Peck

22 papers receiving 327 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
George C. Peck 345 109 93 64 58 25 380
C. Spencer Cochran 427 1.2× 126 1.2× 88 0.9× 70 1.1× 59 1.0× 23 446
Joe M. Gryskiewicz 410 1.2× 95 0.9× 158 1.7× 49 0.8× 36 0.6× 16 436
Farhad Hafezi 288 0.8× 84 0.8× 101 1.1× 30 0.5× 30 0.5× 34 390
Bijan Naghibzadeh 248 0.7× 79 0.7× 46 0.5× 40 0.6× 64 1.1× 35 355
Armando Boccieri 331 1.0× 126 1.2× 42 0.5× 54 0.8× 96 1.7× 25 350
Frederick J. Stucker 237 0.7× 52 0.5× 90 1.0× 24 0.4× 84 1.4× 30 388
Enrico Robotti 301 0.9× 66 0.6× 62 0.7× 38 0.6× 28 0.5× 41 356
Miguel Gonçalves Ferreira 422 1.2× 125 1.1× 106 1.1× 131 2.0× 59 1.0× 34 432
Nabil Fanous 299 0.9× 65 0.6× 233 2.5× 17 0.3× 20 0.3× 39 411
Edward H. Farrior 251 0.7× 22 0.2× 103 1.1× 36 0.6× 54 0.9× 23 336

Countries citing papers authored by George C. Peck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George C. Peck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George C. Peck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George C. Peck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George C. Peck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George C. Peck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George C. Peck. The network helps show where George C. Peck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George C. Peck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George C. Peck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George C. Peck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George C. Peck. George C. Peck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026